期刊文献+

Interfamily pregnancy and expression of CD57, CD68 in deciduas between golden hamster and mouse 被引量:1

Interfamily pregnancy and expression of CD57, CD68 in deciduas between golden hamster and mouse
原文传递
导出
摘要 Pregnancy between different species is one of the key steps to interspecific somatic cell cloning. Although interspecific clone embryos have been constructed, they could not develop to birth after being transferred to recipi-ents. In order to clarify the mechanism of this phenomenon, interfamily pregnancy between golden hamste (Mesocricetus auratus) and mouse (Mus musculus) was studied. Co-culture results indicated that the adhesion ratios of golden hamster blastocysts on mouse uterine epithelia monolayer 12, 24, 48 and 72 h after co-culture were all significantly lower than those of mouse blastocysts. The outgrowth ratios of golden hamster blastocysts on mouse uterine epithelia monolayer 48, 72 h after co-culture were both significantly lower than those of mouse blastocysts (P < 0.01). Golden hamster抯 blastula could be implanted and develop to D 11 of pregnancy after being transferred to mouse uterus (the 7th day after embryo transfer). Compared to the transfer of mouse embryo to mouse uterus, the successful ratio of interfamily embryo transfer was lower and the bulk of fetus was smaller than that of intraspecific fetus. Compared to intraspecific preg-nancy of mouse, the remote decidual tissue of interfamily pregnancy on D8 is looser. At the same time, expressions of CD57 and CD 68 in remote deciduas were both higher than those in the secondary deciduas in both intraspecific and interfamily pregnancy. However, expressions of the two molecules in interfamily pregnancy were lower than those in intraspecific pregnancy. These results showed that interfam-ily pregnancy could be established between golden hamster and mouse. But the development of fetus in interfamily pregnancy was slower than that in intraspecific pregnancy. The expression difference of CD57 and CD68 indicates the difference of immunoreaction between interfamily and in-traspecific pregnancy, which may be one of the reasons lead-ing to interfamily pregnancy termination. Pregnancy between different species is one of the key steps to interspecific somatic cell cloning. Although interspecific clone embryos have been constructed, they could not develop to birth after being transferred to recipients. In order to clarify the mechanism of this phenomenon, interfamily pregnancy between golden hamste (Mesocricetus auratus) and mouse (Mus musculus) was studied. Co-culture results indicated that the adhesion ratios of golden hamster blastocysts on mouse uterine epithelia monolayer 12, 24, 48 and 72 h after co-culture were all significantly lower than those of mouse blastocysts. The outgrowth ratios of golden hamster blastocysts on mouse uterine epithelia monolayer 48, 72 h after co-culture were both significantly lower than those of mouse blastocysts (P < 0.01). Golden hamster’s blastula could be implanted and develop to D 11 of pregnancy after being transferred to mouse uterus (the 7th day after embryo transfer). Compared to the transfer of mouse embryo to mouse uterus, the successful ratio of interfamily embryo transfer was lower and the bulk of fetus was smaller than that of intraspecific fetus. Compared to intraspecific pregnancy of mouse, the remote decidual tissue of interfamily pregnancy on D8 is looser. At the same time, expressions of CD57 and CD 68 in remote deciduas were both higher than those in the secondary deciduas in both intraspecific and interfamily pregnancy. However, expressions of the two molecules in interfamily pregnancy were lower than those in intraspecific pregnancy. These results showed that interfamily pregnancy could be established between golden hamster and mouse. But the development of fetus in interfamily pregnancy was slower than that in intraspecific pregnancy. The expression difference of CD57 and CD68 indicates the difference of immunoreaction between interfamily and intraspecific pregnancy, which may be one of the reasons leading to interfamily pregnancy termination.
机构地区 Chinese Acad Sci
出处 《Chinese Science Bulletin》 SCIE EI CAS 2003年第18期1956-1961,共4页
关键词 interfamily PREGNANCY GOLDEN HAMSTER MOUSE CD57 CD68. interfamily pregnancy golden hamster mouse CDS7 CD68
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Xichao Wang,Bojie Dai,Enkui Duan,Dayuan Chen.Advances in interspecific pregnancy[J].Chinese Science Bulletin,2001,46(21):1772-1778. 被引量:1
  • 2DAIBojie,CAOYujing,等.Expression of LIF,VEGF,CD57 and CD68 after the transfer of rat embryos to mouse uteri[J].Chinese Science Bulletin,2003,48(6):542-548. 被引量:2
  • 3REP ORTS3.Domiko,T.Mitalipova,M.Hale y,B.etal.Bo vineoo cytecyto-p lasmsupp ortsdevelop me ntofemb ryosprod us edbynuc leartran sf erofsom atic cellnu clei fromvar iousmamma lianspecies,Boil. Reproduction . 1999
  • 4KabawatSE,MostoufizadehM,DriscolSG,etal.Implantationsiteinnormalpregnancy:Astudywithmonoclonalantibodies. American Journal of Pathology . 1985
  • 5SPINDLEAI,PEDERSENRA.Hatching,atachmentandoutgrowthofmouseblastocystsinvitro:fixednitro-genrequirement. Journal of Experimental Zoology . 1973
  • 6Kream er,D.C.Intra-an dinter specificembryotransfer,J. Exp.Zool . 1983
  • 7Chen,S.TransplantationImmunol ogy(inChinese),1sted. . 1998
  • 8Chen,D.Y,Sun,Q.Y,Liu,J. L. etal.T hegia ntpanda (Ailuro-po damelanoleuc a)somat icnucle usc andedifferentita te inrabb itoocy tepla sma ndsuppor tsear lydevelopme nt oft hereconstruct edegg. Scien ceinChina,Ser.C . 1999
  • 9Dai,B.J,Cao,Y.J,Wan g, X.C.etal.Expr essionofLIF,VEG F,CD57a ndCD6 8af terrate mbryostrans ferr edintom ouse抯uterusChinese Science Bulletin,2003.
  • 10Zeng,G.Q,Cao,Y.J.Co -cult ureofm ouse embryowit hm onolaye rofuterine epithelialcells. ActaZoologicaSinica . 1996

二级参考文献50

  • 1LI Sumin,CAO Yujing,ZHANG Jian,TIAN Yongqiang,ZHENG Xing,DUAN Enkui.Effects of vascular endothelial growth factor on MMPs during embryo implantation in mice[J].Chinese Science Bulletin,2002,47(24):2071-2074. 被引量:2
  • 2陈大元,孙青原,刘冀珑,李光鹏,廉莉,王敏康,韩之明,宋祥芬,李劲松,孙强,陈玉村,张亚平,丁波.The giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) somatic nucleus can dedifferentiate in rabbit ooplasm and support early development of the reconstructed egg[J].Science China(Life Sciences),1999,42(4):346-353. 被引量:22
  • 3H. Kurz,Ulrich Zechner,Annie Orth,Reinald Fundele.Lack of correlation between placenta and offspring size in mouse interspecific crosses[J]. Anatomy and Embryology . 1999 (3)
  • 4C.A. PINKERT,M.H. IRWIN,L.W. JOHNSON,R.J. MOFFATT.Mitochondria transfer into mouse ova by microinjection[J]. Transgenic Research . 1997 (6)
  • 5Atushi Fujiwara,Syuiti Abe,Etsuro Yamaha,Fumio Yamazaki,Michihiro C. Yoshida.Uniparental chromosome elimination in the early embryogenesis of the inviable salmonid hybrids between masu salmon female and rainbow trout male[J]. Chromosoma . 1997 (1)
  • 6H. Akram,J. -P. Weniger.Transplantations interspécifiques de gonades embryonnaires de Phasianidés[J]. Experientia . 1967 (9)
  • 7Tong, D. Z,Ye, Y. R,Lu, D. Y. et al.Nuclear transfer between different subfamilies in fish. J. Animal . 1973
  • 8Rossant, J,Croy, B. A,Clark, D. A. et al.Interspecific hybrids and chimeras in mice. Journal of Experimental Zoology . 1983
  • 9Meinecke-Tillmann, S,Meinecke, B.Experimental chimaeras removal of reproductive barrier between sheep and goat. Nature . 1984
  • 10Chen, J. B,Guo, Z. Q,Liang, H. Y.Elementary experiment of embryo transfer of common bovine embryos into recipient yak. Herbivore . 1995

共引文献1

同被引文献18

  • 1ROSSANT J,MAURO V M,CROY B A.lmportance of Trophoblast Genotype for Survival of Interspecific Murine Chimaeras[J].J Embryol Exp Morphol,1982,69:141-149.
  • 2ROSSANT J,CROY B A,CHAPMAN V M,et al.Interspecific Chimeras in Mammals:A New Experimental System[J].J Anim Sci,1982,55 (5):1241-1248.
  • 3BUCKRELL B C,GARTLEY C J,MEHREN K G,et al.Failure to Maintain Interspecific Pregnancy after Transfer of Dall's Sheep Embryos to Domestic Ewes[J].J Reprod Fertil,1990,90(2):387-394.
  • 4FRELS W I,ROSSANT J,CHAPMAN V M.Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors Affecting the Viability of Mus Caroli x M Musculus Hybrid Embryos[J].J Reprod Fertil,1980,59(2):387-392.
  • 5JONES C J,WOODING F B,ABD-ELNAEIM M M,et al.Glycosylation in the Near-term Epitheliochorial Placenta of the Horse,Donkey and Camel:A Comparative Study of Interbreeding and Non-interbreeding Species[J].J Reprod Fertil,2000,118(2):397-405.
  • 6AKRAM H,WENIGER J P.Interspecific Transplantations of Embryonic Gonads of Phasianidea[J].Experientia,1967,23(9):761-763.
  • 7LIN Xue-yan,ZHANG Ling.Modern Cellular and Molecular Immunology(1st Edition)[M].Beijing:Science Publishing House,1999:30-82.
  • 8MCELHINNY A S,KADOW N,WARNER C M.The Expression of the Qa-2 Antigen in Mouse Preimplantation Embryos and Its Correlation with the Ped Gene Phenotype[J].Mol Hum Reprod,1998,4 (10):966-971.
  • 9WARNERC M,EXLEY GE,MCELHINNY A S,et al.Genetic Regulation of Preimplantation Mouse Embryo Survival[J].JExpZool,1998,282 (1-2):272-279.
  • 10XN Y,JIN P,WARNER C M.Modulation for Preimplantation Embryonic Development by Antisense Oligonucleotides to Major Histocompatibility Complex Genes[J].Biol Reprod,1993,48(5):1042-1046.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部