军事法官的角色冲突与重构

Conflict and Reconstruction of Military Judge's Role

从理论和现实角度考察， 把我国军事法院专职审判人员的称谓统一为“军事法官”是合适的。在我国现行军事司法体制下， 军事法官受到了公正法律世界、军队政治机关、军事社区文化三种权威的制约，相应地存在着理性人、社会人、经验人三重角色的分离。军事法官处理个案无异于在上述三种角色期待之间调和冲突并寻求最佳位置。我国军事诉讼立法资源稀薄， 军事审判适用规范庞杂， 军事司法的相对独立性得不到应有的尊重， 导致军事法官的角色定位与行为模式选择很难满足司法公正的内在要求。因此， 有必要调整军事司法机关的归属地位， 改革军事法院内部管理体制和工作程序， 提高军事法官的综合素质， 加快军事诉讼立法步伐。

Investigating from the angle of the theory and fact, it is advisable to name Chinese military court's professional judge“military judge”。 Within the present military judicial system, the role of military judge is separated into three roles:ideal man, social man and experienced man while restricted by three powers from fair legal world, military political administration and army community culture. The truth remains that during handling a case, military judge's whole effort is nothing less than to reconcile conflict and seek suitable position among the three mentioned powers. Insufficient resources of military lawsuit legislation, numerous and jumbled enforcement rules, little respect for relative isolation of military justice, all of which lead to that military judge's role position and conduct mode cannot meet the judicial fair needs. To limit negative factors, some advice is as follows:revising the ownership of military judicial department, innovating inner management and work style of military court, achieving military judge's comprehensive quality, fastenning the step of military lawsuit legislation.