期刊文献+

脑梗死的扩散张量成像与扩散加权成像比较研究 被引量:3

Diffusion tensor imaging and diffusion weighted imaging of cerebral infarction:comparative study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 比较脑梗死的扩散张量成像与扩散加权成像的影像表现 ,评价其临床应用价值。方法 本研究包括 40例脑梗死患者。影像检查时间从卒中发病后 11h至 9个月。计算病灶侧与对侧的表观扩散系数 (ADC)、各向异性分数(FA)、各向异性指数 (AI) ,进行配对t检验。结果 急性期和亚急性早期、亚急性晚期病灶在扩散加权图像上呈高信号 ;慢性期病灶表现为低信号和 /或高信号。急性期、亚急性早期病灶ADC平均值 ( 3 .2 2 72± 1.0 12 6)低于对侧 ( 7.8861±0 .5 40 7) ,P <0 .0 0 1。慢性期病灶ADC平均值 ( 11.662 9± 1.42 5 1)高于对侧 ( 7.72 48± 0 .7164 ) ,P <0 .0 0 1。亚急性晚期病灶ADC平均值与对侧相比无显著性差异 ,P =0 .814。各期病灶的FA、AI平均值低于对侧 ,P <0 .0 0 1。结论 扩散加权成像可快速检出急性期和亚急性期责任病灶 ,但ADC图不能准确评价各期脑梗死灶水分子的扩散状态。 Objective To compare and evaluate diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) in cerebral infarctions. Methods Forty patients were analyzed from 11 hours to 9 months after stroke onset. ADC (apparent diffusion coefficient), FA (fractional anisotropy) and AI (anisotropy index) of the lesions and the contralateral side were calculated and compared with paired t test. Results Lesions of acute and subacute phases were with high signal on DWI images, while chronic lesions were with mixed signal. ADC value of acute and early subacute lesions was lower (3.2272± 1.0126 ) than contralateral side ( 7.8861 ± 0.5407 ), P <0.001. ADC value of chronic lesions was higher (11.6629±1.4251) than contralateral side (7.7248±0.7164), P < 0.001 . There was no significant difference between late subacute lesions and contralateral side, P =0.814. FA and AI of lesions with different phases was lower than contralateral side, P <0.001. Conclusion DWI is useful for detecting acute and subacute lesions. ADC could not reveal the diffusion status of infarctions with different phases. FA and AI could show the decrease of anisotropy in lesions.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 2004年第6期853-855,共3页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
关键词 磁共振成像 扩散 扩散张量 脑梗塞 Magnetic resonance imaging Diffusion, brain Diffusion tensor Brain infarction
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1[1]Sorensen AG, Wu O, Copen WA, et al. Human acute cerebral ischemia: detection of changes in water diffusion anisotropy by using MR imaging[J]. Radiology, 1999,212(3) :785-792.
  • 2[2]Mukherjee P, Bahn MM, McKinstry RC, et al. Differences between gray matter and white matter water diffusion in stroke: diffusion-tensor MR imaging in 12 patients[J]. Radiology, 2000, 216(1) :211-220.
  • 3[3]Osborn AG, Tong KA. Handbook of Neuroradiology: Brain and Skull[M]. St Louis: Mosby, 1996. 373-388.
  • 4[4]Yang Q, Tress BM, Barber PA, et al. Serial study of apparent diffusion coefficient and anisotropy in patients with acute stroke[J]. Stroke, 1999,30 (11): 2382-2390.
  • 5[6]Warch S, Moseley ME, Sorensen AG, et al. Acute human stroke studied by whole brain echo planar diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Ann Neurol, 1995,37(2): 231-241.
  • 6[7]Gillard JH, Papadakis NG, Martin K, et al. MR diffusion tensor imaging of white matter tract disruption in stroke at 3T [J]. The British Journal of Radiology, 2001,74(883) :642-647.

同被引文献32

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部