口腔修复治疗中铸造支架运用50例临床分析

Clinical Analysis of 50 Cases with Oral Repair Casting Stents

目的:探讨和分析铸造支架运用于口腔修复治疗的临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析50例在本院牙科进行口腔修复治疗的患者临床资料,所有患者随机分成两组,钴铬合金组采用钴铬合金支架进行治疗,钛合金组采用钛合金支架进行治疗,通过术后随访,比较两组患者的临床效果、并发症以及满意程度等。结果:钴铬合金组出现1例并发症占总数的4.00%(1/25),钛合金组的4.00%(1/25)的并发症率相比差异不显著(P>0.05),钴铬合金组患者满意率为96.00%(24/25)与钛合金组的90.38%(23/25)相比差异不显著(P>0.05),差异不具有统计学意义。结论:铸造支架运用于口腔修复治疗中能显著改善口腔修复的临床效果,能获得较高的临床满意度,且钴铬合金与钛合金铸造支架在临床疗效及副作用方面差异不显著,值得临床推广使用。

Objective:To explore and analyze the clinical effect of oral repair casting stents. Methods:Analyzing the clinical data of 50 cases treated in the hospital for dental restorations. All patients were randomly divided into two groups. Cobalt chromium alloy group was treated with cobalt chromium alloy stents, and titanium alloy group was treated with titanium alloy stents. Through the follow-up interview, clinical results, complications, and satisfaction of the two groups were compared. Results:Two groups each had 1 case of complication, and there was no significant difference. Cobalt chromium alloy group of patients satisfaction rate was 96.00%(24/25), and the satisfaction of titanium alloy group was 90.38%(23/25). There was no statistical significance (P>0.05). Conclusion:Casting bracket used in dental restorations can obtain higher satisfaction with clinical treatment, and cobalt chromium alloy and titanium alloy casting stents had no significant difference in the clinical curative effect and side effect. So it is worth clinical promotion.