摘要
采用顺序启动范式,以负性事情为材料,通过对80名被试的测量,两个实验考察了反事实思维的功能说。结果发现:(1)可控性任务中,个体偏向于行为获益,且行为获益的思考时间小于情绪获准;(2)不可控任务中,个体偏向于情绪获益,且情绪获益的选择时间小于行为获益;(3)任务不同,反事实思维的功能不一样。
Using sequential priming paradigm,the negative things as material,through the measurement of 80 subjects,two experiments examine the function of counterfactual thinking.The results show:(1) In controllable task,individuals tend to behavior benefit,benefit less than emotional allowed;(2) In the uncontrollable task,individuals tend to choose the emotional benefit,benefit less than behavior benefit;(3) different tasks,the function is not the same as the counterfactual thinking.
出处
《佳木斯教育学院学报》
2013年第1期233-234,共2页
Journal of Jiamusi Education Institute
关键词
反事实思维
情绪获益
行为获益
计划行为理论
counterfactual thinking
emotional benefit
behavior benefit
theory of planned behavior