期刊文献+

团队承诺对知识分享的影响机制研究 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 整合团队承诺与知识分享相关理论,探索情感承诺对任务承诺的影响,情感承诺和任务承诺对知识分享的影响。文章利用长三角地区79个研发团队的实证数据表明:情感承诺与任务承诺显著正相关,情感承诺与显性知识分享和隐性知识分享显著正相关,任务承诺与显性知识分享和隐性知识分享显著正相关。研究结果为组织利用任务承诺与情感承诺提高团队知识分享有重要的实践意义。
作者 林巍 严广乐
出处 《现代管理科学》 CSSCI 2013年第9期95-97,共3页 Modern Management Science
基金 上海市一流学科建设项目(项目号:S1205YLXK)
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Nahapiet J,Ghoshal S. Social capital,intellectual capital,and the organizational advantage[J].Academy of Management Review,1998,(02):242-266.
  • 2Yang J T. Knowledge sharing:Investiga-ting appropriate leadership roles and collab-orative culture[J].Tourism Management,2007,(02):530-543.
  • 3Huber G. Transfer of Knowledge in Kno-wledge Management Systems:Unexplored Issues and Suggested Studies[J].European Journal of Info-rmation Systems,2001,(02):72-79.
  • 4Hislop D. Linking human resource mana-gement and knowledge management via commit-ment:a review and research agenda[J].Employee Relations Update,2003,(02):182-202.
  • 5Hooff B V,Weenen F L. Committed to share:Commitment and CMC use as antecedents of knowledge sharing[J].Knowledge and Process Mana-gement,2004,(01):13-24.
  • 6Polanyi M. The Tacit Dimension[M].London:Boutledge and Kegan Paul,1966.160-164.
  • 7Alavi M,Leidner D E. Review:knowledge management and knowledge management systems:conceptual foundations and research issues[J].MIS Quarterly,2001,(01):107-136.doi:10.2307/3250961.
  • 8Mowday R T,Steers R M,Porter L W. The measurement of organizational commitment[J].Journal of Vocational Behavior,1979,(02):224-247.
  • 9Allen N J,Meyer J P. The measurement and antecedents of affective,continuance and normative commitment to the organization[J].Jour-nal of Occupational Psychology,1990,(01):1-18.
  • 10Mowday R T,Steers R M,Porter L W. Employee organization linkages:The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism and Turnover[M].New York:Academic Press,Inc,1982.

二级参考文献7

共引文献21

同被引文献21

  • 1王怡然,陈士俊,王梅.科研团队中的信任问题[J].西南交通大学学报(社会科学版),2006,7(6):10-13. 被引量:10
  • 2Harvey M, Novicevic M M, Garrison G. Challenges to staffing global virtual teams [J]. Human Managonmat Review, 2004, 14 (3): 275- 294.
  • 3Chert T, Chert Y, Chu H. Developing a trust evaluation method be- twoon co- workers in virtual project team for enabling resource sharing and collaboration [ J]. Computers in Industry, 2008, 59 (6) : 565 - 579.
  • 4Barueh Y, Lin C. All for one, one for all: Coopetition and virtual team performance [ J ]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2012, 79 (6): 1155-1168.
  • 5Lin C P. To share ar not to share: modeling knowledge sharing using exchange ideology as a moderator [ J ]. Pet's. Rev, 2007, (36) : 457 - 475.
  • 6HsuM, JuTL, YcoC, etal. Knowledge sharing behav/or in v/mud conmmnities: 'Ihe relationship between mist, serf- efficacy, and out- come eectaficos [ J ]. International JLmal of Human- Computer Studies, 2007, 65 (2): 153-169.
  • 7Rapp A, Ahearne M, Mathieu J, et 81. Managing sales teams in a virtual environment [ J]. International Journal of Research in Market- ing, 2010, 27 (3): 213-224.
  • 8Lin C. Modeling job effectiveness and its antecedents from a social cap- ital perspective: A survey of virtual teams within business organizations [J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2011, 27 (2): 915-923.
  • 9Tamjidyamcholo A, Bin Baba M S, Tamjid H, et al. Information security- Prffessional perceptions of knowledge - sharing intention un- de self - efficacy, trust, reciprocity, and shared - language [ J ]. Computers & Education, 2013, 68 (0): 223-232.
  • 10Cheung C K, Chan C M. Social - cognitive factors of denating money to charity, with special attention to an international relief organization [J]. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2000, 23 (2): 241-253.

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部