摘要
选取140例输卵管妊娠病例,随机分腹腔镜保守方法治疗为观察组与传统开腹术为对照组,各70例。观察组平均手术时间、出血量、住院时间显著少于对照组,且P<0.05;观察组术后输卵管通畅率、宫内妊娠率均显著高于对照组,P<0.05,有统计学意义。腹腔镜保守方法治疗输卵管妊娠具有良好的预后,是术后有妊娠需求女性的首选方法。
Selected 140 cases of tubal pregnancy were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group and there are 70 cases in each group.The observation group and the control group were treated with laparoscopic conservative treatment and the traditional open surgery,respectively.The observation group's average operation time,bleeding volume and the hospitalization time were significantly less than that in the control group P < 0.05.Moreover,patency rate of postoperative fallopian tube and Miyamauchi rate were significantly higher than that of the control group(P < 0.05).Therefore,laparoscopic conservative treatment for tubal pregnancy has better prognosis after operation,which is the preferred method for women with pregnancy needs.
出处
《生物医学工程学进展》
CAS
2013年第2期105-106,共2页
Progress in Biomedical Engineering
关键词
腹腔镜
保守方法
输卵管妊娠
laparoscopic,conservative methods,tubal pregnancy