期刊文献+

“恐怖·狂欢·虔恪”与本真救赎——战国策派美学旨趣新探

"Horror,Exultation,Piety" and "Authenticity" Salvation: New Exploration on Esthetic Principles of the School of Zhanguoce
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《寄语中国艺术人》是战国策派的美学纲领,须结合《中国心灵》才能读懂战国策派的美学旨趣。战国策派美学始于反对儒道,却终于复归道家,因为中国人就社会属性是儒家信徒,作为个体却是道教徒。陈铨等人所意识到的时代病是战国策派无力解决的,因而以海德格尔的学说格义道家作为药方,从美学概念引向哲学概念。虔恪的"绝对之体",对于"超人"而言是以老子的"无"为终;对于"超人"与"末人"以外的第三种人而言,是以海德格尔的本真为终。因此,在陈铨的文学作品中,我们阅读到本真的救赎。 To the Artists in China is an esthetic purport of the School of Zhanguoce,which esthetic taste would be clearly understood only with reference to China Hearts.The 'ultimate substance' of piety is Taoism.To the Artists in China initiated with anti-Confucianism and anti-Taoism but finally returned to Taoism.This is because there are dual characteristics for Chinese who are Confucians in social practices but Taoists in private practices.Chen Quan,Lin Tongji and Lei Haizong realized that the disease of the age could not be solved by their school.So,they oriented the esthetical concept to philosophical concept by interpreting Taoism with the theory of M.Heidegger as a prescription for the age disease.The 'ultimate substance' for piety for 'superman' is Taoism's 'emptiness',while for the third party other than 'superman' and 'petty man' is M.Heidegger's 'authenticity'.Therefore,salvation for 'authenticity' could be read in Chen Quan's literary works.
作者 叶金辉
机构地区 南开大学中文系
出处 《武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 北大核心 2013年第1期73-77,共5页 Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
关键词 战国策派 美学旨趣 虔恪 '超人' '末人' 道家 存在 本真 the School of Zhanguoce aesthetic taste piety 'superman' 'petty man' Taoism being authenticity
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1冯宪光."战国派"美学思想的渊源——评《寄语中国艺术人》[A]重庆:重庆出版社,1984328-331.
  • 2欧阳凡海.什么是"战国策"派的文艺[A]上海:上海文艺出版社,1990461-462.
  • 3尼采;周国平.悲剧的诞生:尼采美学文选[M]北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,19865-6.
  • 4独及;林同济.寄语中国艺术人--恐怖@狂欢@虔恪[N]大公报:战国副刊,1942.
  • 5林同济.中国心灵:道家的潜在层[A]上海:复旦大学出版社,2004.
  • 6雷海宗.时代的悲哀[A]长春:吉林出版集团有限责任公司,2010147-153.
  • 7彭小燕.存在主义视野下的鲁迅[M]北京:北京大学出版社,200765.
  • 8中国现代文学馆.陈铨代表作[M]北京:华夏出版社,2009116.
  • 9高阿蕊.战国策派的美学思想初探——以陈铨和林同济为代表[D]重庆:西南大学,2011114-115.
  • 10王凯.海德格尔与老子思想的核心问题[J].武汉大学学报(人文科学版),2001,54(4):419-425. 被引量:2

二级参考文献8

  • 1陈鼓应.老子注释及评介[Z].北京:中华书局,1984.
  • 2陈鼓应.庄子今注今释[Z].北京:中华书局,1983.
  • 3HEIDEGGER Martin.Basic Writings[M].New York:Harper & Row Publishers,1976.
  • 4HEIDEGGER Martin.Einffihrung in Die Metaphysik[M]. Tubingen,1 976.
  • 5HEIDEGGER Martin.ON the Way to Language[M]. New York:Harper & Row,Publishers,1982.
  • 6西方哲学原著选读:上卷[M].北京:商务印书馆,1983.
  • 7HEIDEGGER Martin.Basic Writings[M]. New York:Harper & Row,Publishers,1976.
  • 8彭富春.道的悖论[J].西南民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2000,21(2):33-37. 被引量:4

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部