期刊文献+

厄洛替尼治疗EGFR状态未知晚期肺腺癌的疗效观察 被引量:3

Efficacy of erlotinib and PC regimen in treatment of advanced lung adenocarcinoma with unknown EGFR status
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察厄洛替尼治疗表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)状态未知晚期肺腺癌的近期疗效与安全性。方法将49例晚期肺腺癌患者随机分成两组:厄洛替尼组24例,给予厄洛替尼150 mg/d口服;化疗组25例,给予一级标准化疗方案。比较两组的近期疗效、毒副反应及生存情况。结果厄洛替尼组总有效率为37.5%,疾病控制率为66.7%,毒副反应主要为Ⅰ~Ⅱ级,包括皮疹、腹泻和呕吐等;化疗组总有效率为32.0%,疾病控制率为64.0%,毒副反应主要为骨髓抑制、胃肠道反应。两组总有效率比较无统计学差异(P>0.05),厄洛替尼组毒性反应发生率明显低于化疗组(P<0.05)。厄洛替尼组中位无进展生存期为8.3个月,中位生存期为10.2个月;化疗组中位无进展生存期为7.1个月,中位生存期为8.4个月,两组比较均无统计学差异(P均>0.05)。结论厄洛替尼治疗EGFR状态未知晚期肺腺癌患者的近期疗效与标准化疗方案相似,且不良反应少,患者耐受性好,可以作为EGFR状态未知的晚期肺腺癌患者的优选方案。 Objective To compare the objective response and toxicity of erlotinib and platinum-based chemotherapy( PC) in the treatment of advanced lung adenocarcinoma with unknown EGFR status and to explore the treatment strategies of advanced lung cancer with unknown EGFR status. Methods Forty-nine cases of patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma were randomly divided into two groups,the erlotinib group( n = 24) was given erlotinib 150 mg / d orally and the chemotherapy group( n = 25) was given PC regimen. The short-term effects,toxicity and survival of the two groups were compared. Results In the erlotinib group,the total effective rate was 37. 5%,disease control rate was 66. 7%,and mainly toxicities were grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ including rash,diarrhea and vomiting; in the chemotherapy group,the total effective rate was 32. 0%,disease control rate was 64. 0%,and the main toxicities were myelosuppression and gastrointestinal reactions,which were significantly higher than the erlotinib group. No significant difference in the total effective rate was found between the two groups( P > 0. 05),but the toxicity in the erlotinib group was significantly lower than that of the chemotherapy group( P < 0. 05). The median progression-free survival was 8. 3 months,median survival was 10. 2 months in the erlotinib group,and they were seperately 7. 1 months and 8. 4 months in the chemotherapy group( P > 0. 05). Conclusion With less toxicity and good patient tolerance,erlotinib in the treatment of advanced lung adenocarcinoma with unknown EGFR status is not inferior to standard chemotherapy,which may be used as the preferred option of patients.
出处 《山东医药》 CAS 2013年第45期13-15,共3页 Shandong Medical Journal
基金 黄石市医药卫生科研立项项目(2013002)
关键词 肺肿瘤 表皮生长因子受体 厄洛替尼 培美曲塞 顺铂 lung cancer epidermal growth factor pemetrexed cisplatin
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Kim ES,Hirsh V,Mok TJ. Gefitinib versus docetaxel in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer(INTEREST):a randomised phase Ⅲ trial[J].{H}LANCET,2008,(9652):1809-1818.
  • 2徐崇锐,林嘉颖,王震,周清,张国淳,王坤,杨学宁,陈刚,杨衿记,黄玉娟,廖日强,吴一龙.性别与非小细胞肺癌患者吉非替尼疗效之间的关系[J].中华医学杂志,2006,86(37):2606-2610. 被引量:4
  • 3Sharma SV,Bell DW,Settleman J. Epidermal grocwthfator receptormutations in lung cancer[J].{H}Nature Reviews Cancer,2007,(03):169-181.
  • 4Xu Y,Zhang Y,Ma S. EGFR inhibitors with concurrent thoracic radiation therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer[J].{H}Lung Cancer,2011,(03):249-255.
  • 5Tanaka T,Munshj A,Brooks C. Gefitinib radiosensitizes non-small cell lung cancer cell by suppressing cellular DNA repair capacity[J].{H}Clinical Cancer Research,2008,(04):1266-1273.
  • 6Zhang L,Ma SJ,Song X. Gefitinib versus placebo as maintenance therapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic nonsmall-cell lung cancer(INFORM;C-TONG 0804):a multicentre,double-blind randomised phase 3 trial[J].{H}LANCET ONCOLOGY,2012,(05):466-475.
  • 7Fukuoka M,Wu YL,Thongprasert S. Biomarker analyses and final overall survival results from a phase Ⅲ,randomized,open-la-bel,first-hne study of gefitinib versus carboplatin/paclitaxel in clinically selected patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Asia(IPASS)[J].{H}Journal of Clinical Oncology,2011,(21):2866-2874.
  • 8Zhou CJ,Wu YL,Chen G. Edotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutationpositive non-small-cell lung cancer(OPTIMAL,CTONG-0802):a multicentre,open-label,randomised,phase 3 study[J].{H}LANCET ONCOLOGY,2011,(08):735-742.
  • 9Rosell R,Carcereny E,Gervais R J. Edotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer(EURTAC):a multicentre,open-label,randomised phase 3 trial[J].{H}LANCET ONCOLOGY,2012,(03):239-246.
  • 10Mitsudomi F,Morita SJ,Yatabe E. Gefitinib versus cisplatin plus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (WJTOG3405):an open label,randomised phase 3 trial[J].{H}LANCET ONCOLOGY,2010,(02):121-128.

二级参考文献18

  • 1BaoMingQIN,XiaoCHEN,JingDeZHU,DuanQingPEI.Identification of EGFR kinase domain mutations among lung cancer patients in China:implication for targeted cancer therapy[J].Cell Research,2005,15(3):212-217. 被引量:66
  • 2管忠震,张力,李龙芸,蒋国梁,刘叙仪,储大同,赵洪云,李玮.吉非替尼治疗局部晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌在中国的临床研究[J].癌症,2005,24(8):980-984. 被引量:114
  • 3Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, et al. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer [J]. N Engl J Med, 2002,346(2):92-98.
  • 4Yarden Y. The EGFR family and its ligands in human cancer signalling mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities [J]. Eur J Cancer, 2001,37(Suppl 4) :S3-8.
  • 5Schlesinger J. Cell signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases [J].Cell, 2000,103(2) :211-225.
  • 6Woodburn JR. The epidermal growth factor receptor and its inhibition in cancer therapy [J]. Pharmacol Ther, 1999,82(2-3) :241-250.
  • 7Fujino S, Enokibori T, Tezuka N, et al. A comparison of epidermal growth factor receptor levels and other prognostic parameters in non-small cell lung cancer [J]. Eur J Cancer,1996,32A (12): 2070-2074.
  • 8Fukuoka M, Yano S, Giaccone G, et al. Multi-institutional randomized phase Ⅱ trial of gefitinib for previously treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (The IDEAL 1 Trial) [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2003,21(12):2237-2246.
  • 9Kris MG, Natale RB, Herbst RS, et al. Efficacy of gefitinib,an inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, in symptomatic patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized trial [J]. JAMA, 2003,290(16) :2149-2158.
  • 10Cappuzzo F, Gregorc V, Rossi E, et al. Gefitinib in pretreated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): analysis of efficacy and correlation with HER2 and epidermal growth factor receptor expression in locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2003,21 (14): 2658-2663.

共引文献48

同被引文献25

  • 1赵松山,刘友梅,姚家邦,等.中国成年男子体表面积的测量[J].营养学报,1984,6(2):87-96.
  • 2GOVINDAN R, PAGE N, MORGENSZTERN D, et al. Changing epidemiology of small-cell lung cancer in the United States over the last 30 years: analysis of the surveillance, epidemiologic, and end results database [ J ]. J Clin Oncol, 2006,24 ( 28 ) : 4539 - 4544.
  • 3LEWIS G, PEAKE M, AULTMAN R,et al. Cost-effectiveness of erlotinib versus doeetaxel for second-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in the United Kingdom[ J]. J Int Med Res,2010,38(1) :9 -21.
  • 4SCAGLIOTTU GV, PARIKH P, PAWELJV, et al. Phase m study comparing eisplatin plus gemeitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer[ J]. J Clin Oncol, 2008,26 (21) : 3543 - 3551.
  • 5CEPPI P, VOLANTE M, SAVIOZZI S, et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the lung compared with other histotypes shows high- er messenger RNA and protein levels for thymidylate synthase [J]. Cancer, 2006, 107(7) :1589 -1596.
  • 6ZUGAZAGOITIA J, PUENTE J,GONZALEZ-LARRIBA JL,et al. Erlotinib versus pemetrexed for pretreated non-squamous non- small cell lung cancer patients in clinical practice[J]. Oncology, 2013,84(5) :255 -264.
  • 7KARAMPEAZIS A, VOUTSINA A, SOUGLAKOS J, et al. Pemetrexed versus erlotinib in pretreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG) randomized phase 3 study [ J]. Cancer, 2013, 119 ( 15 ) :2754 - 2764.
  • 8HONG J, KYUNG SY, LEE SP,etal. Pemetrexedversusge- fitinib versus erlotinib in previously treated patients with non- small cell lung cancer[ J]. Korean J Intern Med,2010,25 (3) : 294 - 300.
  • 9LEE DH, LEE JS, KIM SW,et al. Three-arm randomised con- trolled phase 2 study comparing pemetrexed and erlotinib to either pemetrexed or erlotinib alone as second-line treatment for never- smokers with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer[ J]. Eur J Cancer,2013,49(15) : 3111 -3121.
  • 10毋永娟,崔荣,华云旗,杨燕霞,刘丽萍,谭亚琴,张文慧,袁海清,刘伟东.培美曲塞与厄洛替尼维持治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床研究[J].中国全科医学,2011,14(9):966-968. 被引量:18

引证文献3

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部