期刊文献+

腹腔镜与开腹低位直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术的临床对照研究 被引量:3

Randomized control study of comparison of laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for lower rectal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的随机对照研究探讨腹腔镜下低位直肠癌TME的可行性及短期治疗效果。方法将69例Duke分期A或B期的低位直肠癌患者随机分为2组,分别行腹腔镜和常规开腹TME手术,比较两组患者围手术期情况、术后并发症以及术后复发和转移情况。结果腹腔镜组平均手术时间、术中出血量、术后肠功能恢复时间分别为(110.8±31.34)h、(84.41±28.41)ml、(2.59±0.99)d,而开腹手术组分别为(133.94±21.01)h、(143.94±34.18)ml、(4.0±1.06)d,差异有统计学意义。淋巴结清扫数目以及术后并发症发生率两组间无显著性差异。腹腔镜手术组保肛率明显高于开腹手术组(85.7%vs.61.8%,P<0.05)。中位随访39.5年,腹腔镜与开腹手术组局部复发分别2例、1例,远处转移分别2例、3例,差异无统计学意义。结论腹腔镜下全直肠系膜切除术治疗低位直肠癌安全可行,短期疗效确切。 Objective To evaluate feasibility of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision(TME) for lower rectal cancer and its short-term outcomes. Methods Sixty-nine lower rectal cancer patients with Duke's A and B stages were randomly assigned to laparoscopic surgery group(n=35)or open surgery group(n=34). Peri-operative indexes, postoperative complications and short-term recurrence or metastasis were compared between the two groups. Results The mean operating time, intra-operative bleeding volume and post-operative bowel function recovery time were(110.8±31.34)h,(84.41±28.41)ml,(2.59±0.99)d in laparoscopic surgery group,while(133.94±21.01)h,(143.94±34.18)ml,(4.0±1.06)d in open group(all P<0.01). There were no significant differences in number of lymph nodes harvested and complication rate between the two groups. The proportion of sphincter-preserving operations in laparoscopic group was significantly higher than that in open group (85.7% vs. 61.8%, P<0.05). After a median follow-up of 39.5 months, local recurrence occurred in 2 and 1 cases, metastasis in 2 and 3 cases respectively in laparoscopic and open groups. Conclusion Laparoscopic TME for lower rectal cancer is safe and feasible with definite short-term outcomes.
出处 《消化肿瘤杂志(电子版)》 2010年第4期217-220,共4页 Journal of Digestive Oncology(Electronic Version)
关键词 低位直肠癌 腹腔镜手术 全直肠系膜切除术 Lower rectal cancer Laparoscopic surgery Total mesorectal excision
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献73

  • 1牟一平,杨鹏,严加费,陈其龙,袁晓明,朱玲华,徐晓武.腹腔镜结肠癌根治术的临床疗效评估[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(9):581-583. 被引量:83
  • 2Kehlet H. Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg, 2006,93 : 1434-1435.
  • 3Chengyu L, Xiaoxin J, Jian Z, et al. The anatomical significance and techniques of laparoscopic rectal surgery. Surg Endosc,2006, 20:734-738.
  • 4Law WL, Lee YM, Choi HK, et al. Impact of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer on operative outcomes and survival. Ann Surg, 2007,245:1-7.
  • 5李强,主编.循证医学.临床证据的产生、评价与利用.北京:科技出版社,2003.8.
  • 6Philippa F. Middleton M.P.H.,Leanne M. Sutherland Ph.D.,Guy J. Maddern F.R.A.C.S., Ph.D..Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery: A Systematic Review[J]. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum . 2005 (2)
  • 7Günther Winde M.D.,Hubert Nottberg M.D.,Ralph Keller M.D.,Kurt W. Schmid M.D.,Hermann Bünte M.D..Surgical cure for early rectal carcinomas (T1)[J]. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum . 1996 (9)
  • 8Conor P. Delaney M.D., Ph.D., F.R.C.S.I.(Gen.),A. Craig Lynch M.D.,Anthony J. Senagore M.D., M.B.A.,Victor W. Fazio M.B., M.S., F.R.A.C.S..Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery[J]. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum . 2003 (12)
  • 9Bonjer HJ,Hop WC,Nelson H,Sargent DJ,Lacy AM,Castells A,Guillou PJ,Thorpe H,Brown J,Delgado S,Kuhrij E,Haglind E,P-hlman L.Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer:a meta-analysis. Archives of Surgery . 2007
  • 10Leung KL,Kwok SP,Lam SC,et al.Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet,The . 2004

共引文献97

同被引文献19

引证文献3

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部