摘要
E·M·福斯特在《最漫长的旅程》的序言中提及认识观的争论对这部小说的影响。这引起了评论家们对小说中认识论问题的关注,有人甚至称《最漫长的旅程》是对穆尔《驳唯心论》的"一种想象的诠释与延伸"。但是细读这部小说,我们可以发现,福斯特似乎并没有满足于描述认识观的谬误及其后果,他还对产生认识观谬误的心理原因进行了探究,而且小说里的探究竟似乎是拉康心理分析理论的变奏。
By way of explanation of the concerns in his The Longest Journey, E.M.Forster foregrounded'the metaphysical idea of reality'.This has drawn adequate critical attention to the epistemological aspects of the novel. A critic even believes that the novel is an imaginative interpretation and extension of G.E.Moore's'The Refutation of Idealism'.However,a perusal of the novel reveals the fact that Forster did not stop at the descriptions of misconceptions and their consequences resulting from epistemological fallacy;he attempted,as well,to explore the psychological reasons for the epistemological fallacy.The explorations in the novel sound like a fictional version of Lacan's psychoanalytic theory.
出处
《英美文学研究论丛》
CSSCI
2009年第1期40-49,共10页
English and American Literary Studies
基金
国家社科基金资助项目(03BWW014)的成果