平面和立体图像的ERP特性研究被引量：1

Research on ERP signal for 2D and 3D images

下载PDF

导出

摘要基于ERP技术,比较了一系列的平面和立体图片刺激的脑电信号。通过分析比较平面和立体图片的脑电信号,发现立体图像诱发的P300成分波幅比平面图像的P300成分波幅大。在非注意条件下,与平面相比,立体图像诱发的N140成分潜伏期较长。注意刺激图片诱发总能量均比非注意刺激图片产生的能量大。 A series of 2D and 3D images' electroencephalography(EEG) using ERP technology were compared.By analyzing EEG signal of 2D and 3D image,it was found that amplitude of P300 component evoked by 3D images is higher than that by 2D images.Especially,in the unattended condition,the N140 component evoked by 3D images has a long latency.Paying attention to stimulus will evoke more EEG energy than that of paying no attention.

作者沈丽丽孟宪茂张晶高强侯春萍

机构地区天津大学电子信息工程学院

出处《吉林大学学报（工学版）》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第S1期101-105,共5页 Journal of Jilin University:Engineering and Technology Edition

基金 "863"国家高技术研究发展计划项目(2012AA011505) 国家自然科学基金项目(60932007) 教育部博士学科点专项科研基金项目(20110032110029)

关键词视觉刺激脑电立体图像质量评价 visual simulation electroencephalography 3D image quality assessment

分类号 TP391.41 [自动化与计算机技术—计算机应用技术]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献11

1王玲,尧德中.深度运动认知的脑电研究——速度因素的影响[J].中国生物医学工程学报,2007,26(6):837-843. 被引量：7
2沈模卫,王锐,唐孝威,朱海燕.随机点立体图视差信息加工的事件相关电位研究[J].航天医学与医学工程,2004,17(2):149-151. 被引量：1
3Tanaka K.Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. Annual Review of Neuroscience . 1996
4Marr D,Nishihara HK.Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.Series B,Biological Sciences . 1978
5Nuwer M R.The Development of EEG Brain Mapping.. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology . 1990
6Aleksandar B,Siunardzict,Emil Jovanovt,et al.3D visu-alization of brain electrical activity. Proc 18th An-nual Int Conf IEEE/EMBS . 1996
7Wang G,Bingo J.Three-dimensional object recognitionlearning alters an early ERP component of N1. Offi-cial Journal of International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology . 2010
8Samardzic,Jovanov E,Starcevic D.Real-time visualiza-tion of brain electrical activity. Real Time Imagine . 1997
9Kim K,Yoon J,Jung K.Influence of task difficulty onthe features of event-related potential during visual odd-ball task. Neuroscience Letters . 2008
10Hagen G,Gather J wright,Lopez B,et al.P3a fromvisual stimuli:task difficulty effects. InternationalJournal of Psychophysiology . 2006

二级参考文献14

1[1]Gillam B, Flagg T and Finlay D. Evidence for disparity change as the primary stimulus for stereoscopic processing[J]. Perception and Psychophysics, 1984, 36(6):559-564.
2[2]Van Ee R,Erkelens CJ. Temporal aspects of binocular slant perception[J]. Vision Research, 1995, 36(1): 43-51.
3[3]Mitchison GJ. The neural representation of stereoscopic depth contrast[J]. Perception, 1993, 22(12): 1415-1426.
4[4]Backus BT, Fleet DJ, Parker AJ,et al. Human cortical activity correlates with stereoscopic depth perception[J]. Journal of Neurophysiol, 2001, 86(4):2054-2068.
5[5]Norcia AM, Sutter EE. Electrophysiological evidence for coarse and fine disparity mechanisms in human[J]. Vision Research, 1985, 25(11):1603-1611.
6[6]Kasai T, Morotomi T. Event-related brain potentials during selective attention to depth and form in global stereopsis[J]. Vision Research, 2001, 41(10-11):1379-1388.
7Frost B J, Sun HongJin. The biological basis of time to collision computation [A]. In: Hecht H, Savelsbergh GJP. eds. Time-tocontact Advances in Psychology Series [ C ]. Amsterdam : Elsevier - North Honan, 2004. 13 - 37.
8Berezovskii VK, Born RT. Specificity of projections from wide-field and local motion-processing regions within the middle temperal visual area of the owl monkey [J]. Nurosei, 2000, ),0(3) :1157 - 1169.
9Luo YueJia, Jiang Yang, Tang YiYuan, et al. Brain mechanism of unconscious visual motion onset [ J ]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2001, 20:1709- 1713.
10Yang CY, Hsieh JC, Chang Y. An MEG study into the visual perception of apparent motion in depth [ J]. Neuroscience Letters, 2006, 403( 1 - 2) :40 - 45.