期刊文献+

超高层结构弹塑性模拟中若干问题的讨论 被引量:3

Discussion on nonlinear time history analysis for super high-rise buildings
原文传递
导出
摘要 弹塑性动力时程分析方法是确定结构大震安全性的重要方法,也是性能化抗震设计的必要工具和必然趋势。本文基于超高层建筑结构弹塑性分析中累积的经验,对模拟和分析结果判断所遇到的问题提出一些见解,并结合某超高层结构案例的分析结果作为辅助论证。文中提出对连梁、巨柱等构件的模拟应抓住构件的受力和在结构中的作用等特征来简化计算模型,认为在软件还不能准确反映构件或材料细观破坏行为情况下不建议采用精细化的模型。由于结构进入塑性后周期会变长,故本文认为对弹塑性分析的基底剪力、层间位移角等应结合结构动力特性的变化及时程波的动力特性进行综合评判。基于我国规范的性能目标评判标准还有待完善。 Non-linear time history analysis is considered to be an important method to verify the structural performance under rare earthquake as well as the essential tool for performance based seismic design. Based on the experience of nonlinear time history analysis of high-rise buildings,this paper proposes some suggestions on the simulation and results assessment then verify them with the project examples. It is argued that the simulation of coupling beam,mega-column should comply with the characteristic and the mechanism of structural element and simplified the model correspondingly. It is suggested that if the program is not able to simulate the element or the material micro-failure process exactly yet,the fine-tuned model is not needed. Because the structure will become flexible after entering plastic stage,the verification of the index including base shear,storey drift ratio and so on should take account the change of dynamic property of the structural and the input earthquake wave. The performance criteria which suits Chinese code is still need to be developed.
作者 甄圣威 汪洋
出处 《建筑结构》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第S1期546-551,共6页 Building Structure
关键词 弹塑性时程分析 连梁 巨型柱 基底剪力 non-linear time history analysis coupling beam mega-column base shear
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献20

  • 1贾鹏,杜修力,赵均.不同轴压比钢筋混凝土核心筒抗震性能[J].北京工业大学学报,2009,35(1):63-69. 被引量:20
  • 2曹万林,黄选明,卢智成,吕西林.钢筋混凝土带暗支撑核心筒体抗震性能试验研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2005,25(3):81-86. 被引量:30
  • 3GB50011-2010建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
  • 4Euro-International Committee for Concrete.CEB-FIP Model Code 1990:Design Code[M].London:Thomas Telford Ltd,1993.
  • 5Ngo D,Scordelis A C.Finite element analysis of reinforced concrete beams[J].J American Concrete Institute,1967,64(3):152-163.
  • 6Keuser M,Mehlhorn G.Finite element models for bond problems[J].J Struct Eng,1987,113(10):2160-2173.
  • 7Ayoub A,Felippou F C.Mixed formulation of bond-slip problems under cyclic loads[J].J,Struct Eng,1999,125(6):661-671.
  • 8Lin C S,Scordelis A C.Nonlinear analysis of RC shells of general form[J].J Struct Divis,1975,101(3):523-538.
  • 9Gilbert R I,Warner R F.Tension stiffening in reinforced concrete slabs[J].J Struct Divis,1978,104(12):1885-1900.
  • 10National Concrete Masonry Association.Cracking of concrete members in direct tension,Report No.ACI224.2R-92[R].Farmington Hills,Michigan:American Concrete Institute,1992.

共引文献145

同被引文献7

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部