期刊文献+

碳关税对中美两国影响的博弈分析 被引量:7

A Game Analysis on the Effects of Carbon Tariff on China and the United States
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于中美两国产品生产成本和单位产品碳排放量均不同的事实,以美国仅实施碳税政策的两阶段博弈模型为基准,引入美国政府对从中国进口产品开征碳关税是由于中国政府未实施环境规制政策的事由,构建了美国继续实施碳关税政策的三阶段博弈模型。运用逆向求解法得出各模型的均衡解,比较了美国继续开征碳关税的效应,发现美国开征碳关税将使美国企业被征收更高的碳税税率,两国企业产量、利润和碳排放量都下降,中国产品国际竞争力提高,但国家福利可能恶化,相反,美国产品国际竞争力下降,国家福利却总是得到改善。 Based on the fact that production cost and unit carbon emission by unit product are different in China and the U.S.,a two-stage game model where the U.S.only impose carbon tax is constructed as a benchmark.Then an argument by the United States that China doesn' t carry out any environmental policy leads the U.S.to impose a carbon tariff on the imports from China is introduced,and the two-stage game model can be changed to a threestage model.By backward induction,the perfect equilibrium of each stage is obtained to compare the effects of imposing a carbon tariff on China and the United States.It' s found that imposing a carbon tariff on imports from China will increase the rate of carbon tax,decrease production and profits of both firms,and lead to less carbon emission.It' s also found that China may be worse off though the international competitiveness of its product is enhanced,however,the United States will always be better off though the international competitiveness of its product is decreased.
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第S2期634-640,共7页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71273114)
关键词 碳税 碳关税 博弈模型 carbon tax carbon tariff game model
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献99

  • 1贺小勇.论世贸组织体制下的环境边境税调整[J].国际商务(对外经济贸易大学学报),1997(5):50-53. 被引量:7
  • 2陈志友.技术性贸易壁垒:机理特征、政策效应、对应措施[J].国际贸易问题,2004(11):26-30. 被引量:17
  • 3吴静,王铮,吴兵.石油价格上涨对中国经济的冲击——可计算一般均衡模型分析[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版),2005,22(2):69-75. 被引量:15
  • 4沈可挺.《全球气候变化问题引发的碳关税争端及其影响》,浙江工商大学经济学院工作论文,2009年.
  • 5Ahmad, N. and A. Wyckoff, Carbon Dioxide Emissions Embodied in International Trade of Goods, OECD Science. Tech nology and Industry Working Papers, 2003/15, OECD Publishing, 2003.
  • 6Dixon, P. B. and B. R. Parmenter, General Equilibrium Modelling for Policy Analysis and Forecasting. In H. Amman, D Kendrick, and J. Rust (eds), Handbook of Computational Economics. Amsterdam: North Holland, 2-85, 1996.
  • 7Eskeland, G. and A. Harrison, Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the pollution haven hypothesis. The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 1744, 1997.
  • 8Feldstein, M. , The Exploding Carbon Tax. The Weekly Standard, Vol. 14, No. 38, 2009.
  • 9Kahrl, F. and D. Roland-Hoist, Growth and Structural Change in China's Energy Economy. UC Berkeley, Research Paper No. 07082001, 2007.
  • 10Lockwood, B. and J. Whalley, Carbon Motivated Border Tax Adjustments: Old Wine in Green Bottles? NBER Working Paper No. 14025, 2008.

共引文献225

同被引文献95

引证文献7

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部