建筑类院校一级学科评估与排名的分析和思考

ANALYSIS AND REFLEC TIONS ON THE FIRST-LEVEL DISCIPLINARY EVALUATION AND RANKING OF ARCHITECTURAL COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES

在对比分析《新闻与世界报道》、《泰晤士报》、《普林斯顿评论》和《设计智慧》这些国外典型的高校评估和排名系统的数据来源、评价方法、体系特色等内容的基础上,回顾和思考了教育部学位中心组织的建筑类院校一级学科评估在方法、指标和程序等方面的经验得失,并重点探讨了一级学科评估对我国建筑类高校的未来发展可能带来的潜在影响。

Based on a comparative analysis on the data sources, evaluation methods and system characteristics of typical college and university assessment and ranking systems, such as US News and World Report, The Thames, The Princeton Review and Design Intelligence, this paper reviews China's First-level Disciplinary Evaluation of architectural colleges and universities launched by China Academic Degrees & Graduate Education Center under Ministry of Education, in terms of methods, indexes and process. It mainly focuses on the potential impacts of the evaluation on the future development of architectural colleges and universities in China.