期刊文献+

国际投资仲裁中股东诉权问题研究

Shareholder's Standing in International Investment Arbitration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在国际投资仲裁管辖权阶段,股东诉权是一个重要的问题。股东诉权的依据主要源于国际投资协定,但由于大部分国际投资协定中"投资者"和"投资"都有宽泛的措辞,且仲裁庭认为"保护和促进投资"是国际投资协定的首要主旨,而赋予股东诉权才能保证该主旨的实现,所以使实践中出现了股东诉权泛化的现象,引发了平行仲裁和投资关系被迫多边化等问题。针对此,国际投资协定中开始出现一些校正和平衡条款,一定程度上遏制了股东诉权泛化。 Shareholders' standing plays a vital role in jurisdiction of international investment arbitration.Its authority always arises from the international investment agreement.However,shareholder's standing expands too much in practice because most international investment agreements adopt broad definitions of 'invest' and 'investor',and because international investment arbitration tribunals are inclined to regard 'protection and promotion of investment' as a prime purpose of international investment agreement.The expansion of shareholder's standing leads to excessive parallel arbitrations and coerced multilateralization of the investment relationship.Accordingly,international investment agreements began to adjust their clauses to handle the foregoing problems,and those clauses indeed eliminate harmful effects of expansion of shareholder's standing.
作者 王稀
机构地区 复旦大学法学院
出处 《世界贸易组织动态与研究(上海对外贸易学院学报)》 北大核心 2013年第5期78-90,共13页 Journal of Shanghai University of International Business and Economics
关键词 股东诉权泛化 国际投资仲裁 条约解释 expansion of shareholder's standing international investment arbitration treaty interpretation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1.Sempra Energy International v.The Argentine Republic(ICSID Case No.ARB/02/16),Decision on Objection to Jurisdiction of May 11 2005[]..
  • 2.GAMIInvestmentsInc.v.Mexica,NAFTAcase,FinalAward[]..2004
  • 3.AmcoAsiaCorp.andothersv.Indonesia[].ICSIDCaseNoARB//DecisiononJurisdiction.1983
  • 4.BPAmerica Production Company,PanAmerican Sur SRL,PanAmerican Fueguina,SRLand PanAmerican Continental SRLv.Argentine[].ICSID CaseNoARB//Decision on Preliminary Objections.2006
  • 5.BPAmerica Production Company,Pan American Sur SRL,Pan American Fueguina,SRL and Pan American Continental SRL v.Argentine[].ICSID Case NoARB//Decision onPreliminary Objections.2006
  • 6.Suez,SociedadGeneraldeAguasdeBarcelonaS.A.andInterAguasServiciosIntegralesdelAguaS.A.v.Argentina[].ICSIDCaseNoARB//Decisionon Jurisdiction.2006
  • 7.Suez,SociedadGeneraldeAguasdeBarcelonaS.A.andInterAguasServiciosIntegralesdelAguaS.A.v.Argentina[].ICSIDCaseNoARB//Decisionon Jurisdiction.2006
  • 8.Suez,SociedadGeneraldeAguasdeBarcelonaS.A.andInterAguasServiciosIntegralesdelAguaS.A.v.Argentina[].ICSIDCaseNoARB//Decisionon Jurisdiction.2006
  • 9KennethJ Vandevelde.U.S.InternationalInvestmentAgreements[]..2009
  • 10.Suez,SociedadGeneraldeAguasdeBarcelonaS.A.andInterAguasServiciosIntegralesdelAguaS.A.v.Argentina[].ICSIDCaseNoARB//Decisionon Jurisdiction.2006

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部