期刊文献+

京杭大运河宿豫段河岸植被缓冲带综合评价 被引量:1

Comprehensive Evaluation of Riparian Vegetation Buffer Strips in Suyu District of Jinghang River
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文运用多指标综合评价法对京杭运河宿豫段景观带河岸植被缓冲带进行评价,旨在考察江苏京杭大运河宿豫段景观带生态功能与社会服务功能发挥状况,通过对运河河岸带及内河河岸带的植被结构完整性、河岸结构稳定性、河岸结构生态性及景观适宜性指标的评价,结果表明,京杭大运河宿豫段景观带河岸植被缓冲带总体评价等级为Ⅱ级较好水平,内河河岸带植被缓冲带的总体评分略高于运河河岸带植被缓冲带。 Utilizing the method of multi-index comprehensive evaluation to evaluate the green waterfront of Suyu district of Jinghang River,this article investigates the operation situation of eco landscape of Suyu district of Jinghang River.The results illustrated that the landscape of Suyu district as a green buffer in Jinghang River was defined as a second ideal level,and the inland waterfront buffer was slightly higher than the green waterfront buffer of Jinghang River in the overall rating through the evaluation the integrity of vegetation structure in the Jinghang waterfront district and the inland waterfront district,the stability of the structure of the waterfront,the ecology of the structure waterfront,and the Landscape suitability.
作者 张峥
出处 《农业科技与信息(现代园林)》 2013年第3期42-49,共8页 Modern Landscape Architecture
关键词 多指标综合评价 植被结构完整性 结构稳定性 结构生态性 景观适宜性 multi-index comprehensive evaluation the integrity of vegetation structure the stability of the structure the ecology of the structure the Landscape suitability
  • 相关文献

同被引文献12

  • 1张建春.河岸带功能及其管理[J].水土保持学报,2001,15(6):143-146. 被引量:136
  • 2夏继红,严忠民.生态河岸带的概念及功能[J].水利水电技术,2006,37(5):14-17. 被引量:68
  • 3Naiman R J, Decamps H, Polloek M. The role of ripari- an corridors in maintaining regional biodiversity [J]. Ecologieal Applications,1993, 3(2) :209-212.
  • 4Correll D L, Jordan T E, Weller D E. Nutrient flux in a landscape: Effects of coastal land use and terrestrial community mosaic on nutrient transport to coastal waters[J]. Estuaries, 1992,15(4): 431-442.
  • 5Lowrance R, Ahier L S, Newbold J D, et al. Water quality functions of riparian forest buffers in Chesapeake Bay watersheds[J]. Environmental Management, 1997, 21(5) : 687-712.
  • 6Mayer P M, Reynolds S K, Mccutchen M D. Meta- Analysis of nitrogen removal in riparian buffers[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality. 2007,36(4): 1172-1180.
  • 7Castelle A J, Johnson A W, Conolly C. Wetland and stream buffer size requirements: A review [J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 1994,23(5):878-882.
  • 8Dillaha T A, Reneau R B, Mostaghimi S, et al. Vegeta- tive filter strips for agricultural nonpoint source pollu- tion control[J]. Transactions, American Society of Ag- ricultural Engineers, 1989,32 (2): 513 519.
  • 9Lee P, Smyth C, Boutin S. Quantitative review of ripar- ian buffer width guide lines from Canada and the United States [J]. Environmental Management, 2004,70 (2) : 165-180.
  • 10Woessner W W. Stream and fluvial plain ground water interactions: Rescaling hydrogeologic thought[J]. Ground Water, 2000,38 (3) : 423-429.

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部