典型绿色建筑评价体系中节地条款比较

Comparative Study of Land Use Guidelines in Several Green Building Rating Systems

将中国绿色建筑评价体系与包括英国BREEAM、美国LEED、日本CASBEE在内的典型国外绿色建筑评估体系对节地条款的内容、权重体系及相应要求等进行比较研究。通过比较,可以发现选址、土地利用、生态环境是节地条款的主要组成部分。在LEED中,土地利用所占分值大于其他部分之和;在CASBEE中生态环境所占分值大于其他部分之和;在BREEAM及China GBL中,仍然是土地利用和生态环境占了最大的分值。同时,还发现了4个评价体系所共同关注的节地指标。此外,与其他体系相比,中国绿色建筑评价体系具有大量的控制项,且对应的绿色建筑等级越高对接地条款的要求就越严格。

A comparative study is addressed between China GBL and some typical foreign Green Building Assessments,including BREEAM,LEED and CASBEE,focusing on the contents,weight system and requirement for Land Use.Through comparison,it has been found that site selection,land utilization,ecology environment are the main components of Land Use(hereafter referred to as LU).The land utilization occupied the most scores than the summation of other factor in LEED,The ecology environment occupied the most scores than the summation of other factor in CASBEE,and still the land utilization and ecology environment occupied the most scores in BREEAM and China GBL.Meanwhile,also found several common indicators being paid attentions in all GABSs.Besides,China GBL is characterized with its large amount of prerequisites than the other GBASs,and the requirements on Land Use category becomes stricter responding to higher green building labels.