摘要
AIM: To assess the role of hyoscine for polyp detectionduring colonoscopy.METHODS: Studies(randomized controlled trials orRCTs) that compared the use of hyoscine vs no hyo-scine or placebo for polyp detection during colonoscopywere included in our analysis. A search on multiple da-tabases was performed in September 2013 with searchterms being "hyoscine and colonoscopy", "hyoscineand polyp", "hyoscine and adenoma", "antispasmoticand colonoscopy", "antispasmotic and adenoma", and"antispasmotic and polyp". Jadad scoring was used toassess the quality of studies. The efficacy of hyoscinewas analyzed using Mantel-Haenszel model for polypand adenoma detection with odds ratio(OR). The I2measure of inconsistency was used to assess hetero-geneity(P < 0.05 or I2 > 50%). Statistical analysis was performed by RevMan 5.1. Funnel plots was used to assess publication bias.RESULTS: The search of the electronic databases identified 283 articles. Of these articles, eight published RCTs performed at various locations in Europe, Asia, and Australia were included in our meta-analysis, seven published as manuscripts and one published as an ab-stract(n = 2307). All the studies included patients with a hyoscine and a no hyoscine/placebo group and were of adequate quality(Jadad score ≥ 2). Eight RCTs as-sessed the polyp detection rate(PDR)(n = 2307). The use of hyoscine demonstrated no statistically significant difference as compared to no hyoscine or placebo for PDR(OR = 1.06; 95%CI: 0.89-1.25; P = 0.51). Five RCTs assessed the adenoma detection rate(ADR)(n = 2015). The use of hyoscine demonstrated no statisti-cally significant difference as compared to no hyoscine or placebo for ADR(OR = 1.12; 95%CI: 0.92-1.37; P = 0.25). Furthermore, the timing of hyoscine admin-istration(given at cecal intubation or pre-procedure) demonstrated no differences in PDR compared to no hyoscine or placebo. Publication bias or heterogeneity was not observed for any of the outcomes.CONCLUSION: Hyoscine use in patients undergoing colonoscopy does not appear to significantly increase the detection of polyps or adenomas.
AIM: To assess the role of hyoscine for polyp detectionduring colonoscopy.METHODS: Studies(randomized controlled trials orRCTs) that compared the use of hyoscine vs no hyo-scine or placebo for polyp detection during colonoscopywere included in our analysis. A search on multiple da-tabases was performed in September 2013 with searchterms being "hyoscine and colonoscopy", "hyoscineand polyp", "hyoscine and adenoma", "antispasmoticand colonoscopy", "antispasmotic and adenoma", and"antispasmotic and polyp". Jadad scoring was used toassess the quality of studies. The efficacy of hyoscinewas analyzed using Mantel-Haenszel model for polypand adenoma detection with odds ratio(OR). The I2measure of inconsistency was used to assess hetero-geneity(P < 0.05 or I2 > 50%). Statistical analysis was performed by RevMan 5.1. Funnel plots was used to assess publication bias.RESULTS: The search of the electronic databases identified 283 articles. Of these articles, eight published RCTs performed at various locations in Europe, Asia, and Australia were included in our meta-analysis, seven published as manuscripts and one published as an ab-stract(n = 2307). All the studies included patients with a hyoscine and a no hyoscine/placebo group and were of adequate quality(Jadad score ≥ 2). Eight RCTs as-sessed the polyp detection rate(PDR)(n = 2307). The use of hyoscine demonstrated no statistically significant difference as compared to no hyoscine or placebo for PDR(OR = 1.06; 95%CI: 0.89-1.25; P = 0.51). Five RCTs assessed the adenoma detection rate(ADR)(n = 2015). The use of hyoscine demonstrated no statisti-cally significant difference as compared to no hyoscine or placebo for ADR(OR = 1.12; 95%CI: 0.92-1.37; P = 0.25). Furthermore, the timing of hyoscine admin-istration(given at cecal intubation or pre-procedure) demonstrated no differences in PDR compared to no hyoscine or placebo. Publication bias or heterogeneity was not observed for any of the outcomes.CONCLUSION: Hyoscine use in patients undergoing colonoscopy does not appear to significantly increase the detection of polyps or adenomas.
