公共政策理论与法院审判职能延展性论析

Analysis of the Public Policy Theory and the Ductility of Judicial Functions

传统理论认为,法院的基本职能是审理案件,并将之视为法院发挥职能的基本依托和司法的应有限度。但建立在信息不对称基础上的公共政策博弈性理论表明,法院有必要延展其审判职能,为公共政策的正当性提供司法保障。基于此,本文立足于必要性论证和现实困境,指出法院审判职能延展与公共政策理论在理念、目标、价值和依据等方面具有高度的契合性,进而分别从法院审判和延展职能的角度解析法院作用于公共政策的基本方式。

Traditional theory believes that the basic function of the court is case trial,which is taken as a basic function of the court and the minimum function of the administration of justice. However,the game theory of public policy based on information asymmetry shows that the court has to extend its trial function and provide judicial protection for the legitimacy of public policy. In this article,the author points out that the court trial function extension and the theory of public policy has a high degree of compatibility in concept,target,value and basis bases on the necessity and reality difficulties,and then analyze the basic mode of the court's action to the public policy from the perspective of the court trial and function extension.