期刊文献+

研发主管目标取向对团队反思与知识分享行为的影响 被引量:2

Effect of R&D team leader's goal orientation on team reflexivity and knowledge sharing behavior
原文传递
导出
摘要 团队已经成为动态环境下企业从事研发活动的基本工作单元,而影响研发团队成员知识分享行为的主要因素一直是研究者关注的热点。本文以企业中的研发团队为研究对象,将团队反思纳入到研发主管目标取向对研发团队成员知识分享行为影响的研究中,并推导一个多层次研究框架。通过对118支研发团队(118名研发主管,605名研发员工)的调查分析,运用多层线性模型进行跨层次分析,得出实证研究结果:研发主管发展员工目标取向与能力展示目标取向对研发员工知识分享行为有显著正向影响;主管回避失败目标取向对知识分享行为具有显著负向影响;分析结果还表明,团队反思在研发主管发展员工取向与能力展示取向对知识分享行为的影响过程中起到中介作用。最后讨论了本研究的管理启示与研究展望。 Effective teams are important cornerstones of successful organizations engaged in R&D activities,especially for those operating in dynamic environments.Based on the theory of Goal Orientation,the paper proposed a multilevel theoretical model in which the team reflexivity were included to examine the relationship between R&D team leader's goal orientation(LGO) and team member's Knowledge Sharing behavior.This study investigated 118 R&D teams,including 118 team leaders and 605 team members.Empirical results show that the dimensions of LGO have different relation with Knowledge Sharing behavior,and team reflexivity has a partial mediating effect on the relationship.Finally,limitations and suggestions for future research and practice are also discussed.
作者 张文勤 刘云
出处 《科研管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第9期154-160,共7页 Science Research Management
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71102148) 江苏高校优势学科与江苏高校哲社优秀创新团队建设项目资助
关键词 主管目标取向 团队反思 知识分享行为 多层线性模型 leader's goal orientation team reflexivity knowledge sharing behavior HLM
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1张文勤,刘云.研发团队反思的结构检验及其对团队效能与效率的影响[J].南开管理评论,2011,14(3):26-33. 被引量:36
  • 2Jen-Te Yang.Knowledge sharing: Investigating appropriate leadership roles and collaborative culture[J].Tourism Management.2006(2)
  • 3(美) 克雷伏特 (Kreft,I.),(美) 里夫 (Leeuw,J.),著.多层次模型分析导论[M]. 重庆大学出版社, 2007
  • 4MartinHoegl,K. PraveenParboteeah.Team reflexivity in innovative projects[J].R&D Management.2006(2)

二级参考文献16

  • 1Schippers, M. C., Den Hartog, D. N., Koopman and van Knip- penberg, D.. The Role of Team Leadership in Enhancing Team Reflexivity and Team Performance. Human Relations, 2008, 61: 1593-1616.
  • 2Somech, A.. The Effects of Leadership Style and Team Process on Performance and. Innovation in Functionally Heterogeneous Teams. Journal of Management, 2006, 32: 32-157.
  • 3Dreu, D., Carsten, K. W.. Cooperative Outcome Interdepen- dence, Task Reflexivity, and Team Effectiveness: A Motivated Information Processing Perspective. Journal of Applied Psy- chology, 2007, 92: 628-638.
  • 4Schippers, M. C., Deanne, N., Hartog, D.. Reflexivity in Teams: A Measure and Correlates. Applied Psychology: An Interna- tional Review, 2007, 56: 189-211.
  • 5De Jong B., Elfring T.. How Does Trust Affect the Performance of Ongoing Teams? The Mediating Role of Reflexivity, Monitoring, and Effort. Academy of Management Journal, 2010, 53: 535-549.
  • 6黄敏萍 戚树诚 黄国隆.跨功能任务团队之结构与效能;一项结构权变模式之观点[J].管理学报,2002,19(6):979-1006.
  • 7Hoegl, M., Parboteeah, K. P.. Team Reflexivity in Innovative Projects. R&D Management, 2006, 36: 113-125.
  • 8Hoegl, M., Gemuenden, H. G.. Teamwork Quality and the Suc- cess of Innovative Projects: A Theoretical Concept and Empiri- cal Evidence. Organization Science, 2001, 12: 435-449.
  • 9Swift, T. A., West, M. A.. Reflexivity and Group Processes: Research and Practice. Sheffield: The ESRC Centre for Organi- zation and Innovation, 1998.
  • 10Janz, B. D., Prasarnphanich P.. Understanding the Antecedents of Effective Knowledge Management: The Importance of a Knowl- edge-centered Culture. Decision Sciences, 2003, 34: 351-384.

共引文献35

同被引文献32

  • 1TAYLOR A, GREVE H R. Superman or the Fan- tastic Four? Knowledge Combination and Experience in Innovative Teams [J]. Academy of Management Journal,2006,49(4) : 723-740.
  • 2CORNELISSEN J P, CLARKE J S. Imagining and Rationalizing Opportunities: Inductive Reasoning, and the Creation and Justification of New Ventures [-J]. Academy of Management Review,2010,35(4) : 539-557.
  • 3HOGG M A, KNIPPENBERG D V, RAST D E. In- tergroup Leadership in Organizations: Leading across Group and Organizational Boundaries[J]. Academy of Management Review,2012,37(2) :232-255.
  • 4TOEGEL G, KILDUFF M, ANAND N. Emotion Helping by Managers: An Emergent Understanding of Discrepant Role Expectations and Outcomes[J]. Acade- my o{ Management Journal,2013,56(2) :234-357.
  • 5PHILLIPS L T, WEISBUCH M, AMBADY N. People Perception Social Vision of Groups and Consequences fro Organizaing and Interacting[J]. Research in Organi- zational Behavior, 2014,34(1) : 101-127.
  • 6SORENSON O,RIVKIN J W, FLEMING L. Corn plexity, Networks and Knowledge Flow[J]. Re search Policy,2006, 35(7): 994-1 017.
  • 7ZHAO Z J, ANAND J. Beyond Boundary Span- ners: The 'Collective Bridge: as an E,fficient Inter- unit Structure for Transferring Collective Knowledge [-J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2013,34 (13) : 1 513-1 530.
  • 8PRATT M G, ROCKMANN K W, KAUFMANN J B. Constructing Professional Identity: The Role of Work and Identity Learning Cycles in the Customi zation of Identity among Medical Professionals[-J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49 ( 2 ):235-262.
  • 9CORNELISSEN J P. Beyond Compare: Metaphor in Organization Theory[J]. Academy of Manage- ment Review, 2005, 30(4) :751-764.
  • 10HERNANDEZ M. Toward an Understanding of the Psychology of Stewardship [J]. Academy of Man agement Review,2012,37(2) :172-193.

引证文献2

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部