摘要
地理空间技术的追踪、数据整合、数据分析的能力,使之比其他技术更具有隐私侵略性,我国应构建科学的地理信息法律制度,并依法使用地理信息技术。文章以《欧盟数据保护指令》的数据处理规范模式及美国公平信息实践原则为视角,比较二者的差异,分析欧盟与美国关于地理信息隐私保护方式的区别与协调机制。欧盟和美国安全港框架下的数据处理实体原则、制度设计对于我国地理信息隐私法律体系的构建有借鉴意义。
Compared with other technology,geospatial technology has more privacy aggressiveness due to its abilities in tracing and data integration and analysis.Thus China should construct a scientific geographic information legal system,according to which geographic information technology is put to use.From the perspective of the normative model of data processing in the EU data protection directive and the American fair information practice principles and by comparing their differences,this paper analyses the differences between the EU and the USA in the ways of geographic information privacy protection and their coordination mechanisms.The data processing material principle and system design under the safe harbor framework of the EU and the USA are of great significance to the construction of Chinese geographic information privacy legal system.
出处
《太原理工大学学报(社会科学版)》
2014年第3期10-13,共4页
Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词
地理空间技术
隐私
法律
geospatial technology
privacy
law