期刊文献+

非高斯风压时程峰值因子的简化计算式 被引量:17

Reduced formula of peak factor for non-Gaussian wind pressure history
原文传递
导出
摘要 采用Hermite矩模型可将非高斯时程表示为高斯时程的非线性函数,建立了非高斯时程和高斯时程之间的一一对应关系,也建立了非高斯峰值因子和高斯峰值因子之间的一一对应关系,为非高斯峰值因子、极值的计算奠定了理论基础。介绍了软化时程、硬化时程和偏斜时程的Hermite矩模型变换理论,明确了高阶矩模型的单调变换范围;在此基础上,研究了软化时程非高斯峰值因子简化计算式的理论误差。结果表明由简化计算式得到的非高斯峰值因子略大,其误差均小于20%。利用非高斯峰值因子的简化计算式,计算了平屋盖表面典型测压点的非高斯峰值因子和风压极值。分析结果表明:绝大多数测压时程样本属于软化时程,极少数样本属于硬化时程或偏斜时程;利用非高斯峰值因子的简化计算式,需要考虑测压时程的随机特性,取多个时程样本峰值因子的平均值作为非高斯峰值因子的代表值。 The non-Gaussian wind history can be expressed as the non-linear function of a Gaussian time history by the Hermite moment models. The one-to-one mapping between the non-Gaussian and the Gaussian time histories is established while the one-to-one mapping between the non-Gaussian and the Gaussian peak factors is produced. The moment-based Hermite models provide a method to formulate the non-Gaussian peak factor and extreme wind pressure.The Hermite models of softening,hardening and skewed histories were introduced in this paper while the monotonic limits of high-order softening models were clarified numerically. The theoretical error of reduced formula for nonGaussian peak factor was investigated. It is indicated that the non-Gaussian peak factor resulted from the reduced formula is slightly larger than the theoretical result and that the relative error is less than 20%. Using the reduced formula of non-Gaussian peak factor,both the peak factors and extreme values of wind pressure on a flat roof were estimated. It is demonstrated that most samples of wind pressure histories belong to the softening histories and a few samples are the hardening or skewed histories and that the mean value of non-Gaussian peak factors is preferred when the randomness of measured samples are considered.
出处 《建筑结构学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第3期20-28,共9页 Journal of Building Structures
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(51378061) 教育部博士点基金项目(20120009110037)
关键词 非高斯风压 Hermite矩模型 偏斜系数 峰态系数 非高斯峰值因子 non-Gaussian wind pressure Hermite moment model skewness kurtosis non-Gaussian peak factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Michael Kasperski.Specification of the design wind load—A critical review of code concepts[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics . 2009 (7)
  • 2Xinzhong Chen,Guoqing Huang.Evaluation of peak resultant response for wind-excited tall buildings[J]. Engineering Structures . 2008 (4)
  • 3Ian Harris.Generalised Pareto methods for wind extremes. Useful tool or mathematical mirage?[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics . 2005 (5)
  • 4J.D. Holmes,L.S. Cochran.Probability distributions of extreme pressure coefficients[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics . 2003 (7)
  • 5E Simiu,N.A Heckert,J.J Filliben,S.K Johnson.Extreme wind load estimates based on the Gumbel distribution of dynamic pressures: an assessment[J]. Structural Safety . 2001 (3)
  • 6R.I. Harris.Improvements to the `Method of Independent Storms’[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics . 1999 (1)
  • 7J.D. Holmes,W.W. Moriarty.Application of the generalized Pareto distribution to extreme value analysis in wind engineering[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics . 1999 (1)
  • 8Fahim Sadek,Emil Simiu.Peak Non-Gaussian Wind Effects for Database-Assisted Low-Rise Building Design. Journal of Engineering . 2002
  • 9Kareem, A.,Zhao, J.Analysis of non-gaussian surge response of tension leg platforms under wind loads. Journal of Offshore Technology . 1994
  • 10Kwon, Dae Kun,Kareem, Ahsan.Peak factors for non-Gaussian load effects revisited. Journal of Structural Engineering . 2011

共引文献5

同被引文献73

引证文献17

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部