期刊文献+

信仰与真实:浙东学派对道学道统论的祛魅

Faith and Truth: the Disenchantment of Dao Tong
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文试图以西方现代史学理论为理论视域,对南宋道学道统论的成立与对其所作的批驳进行探讨,以探视其背后所映射出的经史关系以及经典诠释向度的转型。为此,本文着重分析了陈亮、叶适从历史角度对道统论的批驳及其对道统叙述所造成的影响。通过以上论述,可以看到在经史关系不平衡时,从历史角度对道统论所作的批判多属徒劳,无法从根本上破坏道统叙述。 In the perspective of the modern history theory,this paper analyzes the process of destroying of Dao Tong( 道统) by eastern Zhejiang practical school in the Southern Song Dynasty. This analysis will reveal the hierarchy between Jing( 经) and history,and the methodology transformation of hermeneutics,which are hidden in the disputation of Dao Tong. This analysis focus on the critique coined by Chen Liang( 陈亮) and Ye Shi( 叶适) and the influence of their discussion. The paper concludes that the critique of Dao Tong in historical orientation may have no effect in the era in the Southern Song Dynasty.
作者 郭亚雄
出处 《河北学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第2期220-224,共5页 Hebei Academic Journal
关键词 道统 陈亮 叶适 浙东学派 Dao Tong Chen Liang Ye Shi eastern Zhejiang practical school
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Reorganized and Noted by Xu Daoxun &. Shen Lihua.周予同论经史关系之演变──纪念周先生诞辰百周年[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),1998,40(1):83-89. 被引量:9
  • 2何兆武.对历史学的若干反思[J].史学理论研究,1996(2):36-43. 被引量:146
  • 3(宋)程颢,(宋)程颐著,王孝鱼.二程集[M]中华书局,2004.
  • 4Hoyt Cleveland Tillman.Utilitarian Confucianism:Ch’’en Liang’’s Challenge to Chu His. . 1982
  • 5Benedetto Croce,trans Douglas Ainslie.Theory and History of Historiography. . 1921
  • 6Carl L Becker."What are Historical Facts?". The Western Political Quarterly . 1995
  • 7W.H.Walsh.An Introduction to the Philosophy of History. . 1992

二级参考文献1

共引文献161

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部