期刊文献+

是契约、信任还是信心促成了产学研合作?——两个产学研联盟案例的比较研究 被引量:13

Contract,trust,or confidence: What contributes to the industry- university- research cooperation formation—A comparative study of two industry- university- research alliance cases
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过联盟合作的方式获取外部技术是中国企业实现转型升级的重要途径,然而合作过程中的机会主义行为和绩效风险导致这种合作关系并不容易形成。利用两个产学研联盟案例的扎根性研究,本文构建了一个基于信心的合作形成理论,这个理论能说明在不确定性和需要专用性投入的交易环境下技术需求企业如何与陌生的合作伙伴达成合作协议。研究发现,当契约不足以控制机会主义风险时,合作双方需要信任减少不确定性,两者的互补关系表现在契约和能力信任共同增强了合作信心,另一方面,由于任务复杂性和共同知识的调节作用,契约也有可能会挤出行为信任的需要。 Leveraging external sources of innovation by alliance is an important way to upgrade for Chinese enterprises; however the risks attending the cooperation among partners prevent the formation of the alliance. On the basis of an in- depth study of two alliance cases,this paper develops a theory of alliance formation. This theory can provide insights into how both sides of the alliance achieve agreement for the first- time cooperation under the environment characterized by high uncertainty and transaction- specific investment.In particular,this paper shows that when the contract is not enough to control the opportunism risk,both sides of the alliance turn to the trust to reduce uncertainty. The complementary relation between contract and competence trust can enhance the cooperation confidence,but the strong outcome control of the contract will squeeze out the necessity of the behavior trust.
出处 《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第5期734-740,757,共8页 Studies in Science of Science
基金 浙江省自然科学基金资助项目(LY12G03001) 浙江省教育厅重点项目(Z201121956)
关键词 合作 信心 契约 信任 cooperation confidence contract trust
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献18

  • 1Brunel J, D' Esteb P, Saher A. Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university - industry col- laboration. [ J] Research Policy, 2010, (39) : 858 - 868.
  • 2Welsh R, Glenna L, Lacy W, et al. Close enough but not too far: assessing the effects of university - industry research relationships and the rise of academic capital- ism[J]. Research Policy 2008, (37) :1854 - 1864.
  • 3Owen - Smith J, Powei1 W W. To patent or not. faculty decisions and institutional success at technology transfer [J]. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2001, ( 26 ) : 99-114.
  • 4Becher T, Academic tribes and territories - intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines [ M ]. The Society for Research into Higher Education & the Open Univer- sity, Milton Keynes, 1989. 42 - 43.
  • 5Teece D, Profiting from technological innovation: impli- cations for integration collaboration, licensing and public policy[ J]. Research Policy, 1986, ( 15 ) : 285 - 305.
  • 6Boardman P G, Ponomariov B L, University researchers working with private companies [ J ]. Technovation, 2009,(29) : 142 - 153.
  • 7Van Rijnsoever F J, Hessels L K, Vandeberg R L J, A resource - based view on the interactions of university researchers [ J ]. Research Policy, 2008, ( 37 ) : 1255 - 1266.
  • 8Azagra - Caro J M. What type of faculty member inter- acts with what type of firm? some reasons for the delo- calization of university - industry interaction [ J]. Tech- novation, 2007, ( 27 ) : 704 - 715.
  • 9Giuliani E, Morrison A, Pietrobelli C, et al. Who are the researchers that are collaborating with industry? An analysis of the wine sectors in Chile, South Africa and Italy [ J ]. Research Policy, 2010, ( 39 ) : 748 - 761.
  • 10Renault C, Academic capitalism and university incen- tives for faculty entrepreneurship [ J ]. The Journal of Technology Transfer ,2006, ( 31 ) : 227 - 239.

共引文献12

同被引文献171

引证文献13

二级引证文献83

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部