摘要
美国专门设立军事委员会这一反恐特别军事法庭来管辖特定范围内的恐怖主义犯罪案件,其审判程序明显区别于普通刑事法庭,并在多个方面降低了对被告人权利的保障程度。与美国不同,包括我国在内的世界多数国家在恐怖主义犯罪案件审判管辖上选择了设立非军事性质的反恐专门法庭或由普通刑事法庭审理恐怖主义犯罪案件这两种更为正当、有效的途径。
The United States set up the Military Commissions to try terrorists within a specific range. Thetrial procedure of this special anti-terrorism military court is different from that of the civilian court, andundercut rights of the accused in many aspects. The Military Commissions has been strongly criticized bythe international community and the domestic public. Unlike the United States, our country and mostcountries in the world choose another two more legitimate and effective ways to settle the matter of trialjurisdiction of terrorism crimes: one is setting up non-military special courts, the other is trying terroristsby the ordinary criminal courts.
出处
《河南社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第3期46-51 123,共6页
Henan Social Sciences
基金
2009年度国家社会科学基金项目(09CFX061)
关键词
恐怖主义犯罪
审判管辖
美国
军事委员会
Terrorism
Trial Jurisdiction
The United States
The Military Commissions