期刊文献+

教育经费规范在近代中国宪法中的沉浮 被引量:2

Rise and Fall of Educational Budget in Modern Chinese Constitutions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近代以来,教育经费规范逐渐浮现于中国近代宪法文本中,这一态势持续到1949年。这一现象反映了严格规则主义对中国宪法的影响,折射出围绕着教育权保障所展现的各方利益冲突。这些刚性的操作性规范力图使保障教育权的理想和现实得以统一,虽然它们在某种程度上使人们能在合法范围内争取教育权益;但是规范和现实的落差既暴露出以严格规则主义宪法治国的伤痛,也说明了宪法并不代表宪政。 In the modern times, educational rights gradually gained recognition in the Chinese constitutions. In an effort to protect basic educational rights, a lot of clauses on educational budget were incorporated into various constitutional documents. The content of educational budget became broader and ampler along with modern social progresses. The content of the clauses gradually included the equality of basic education and the equality of opportunity of higher education in different regions. The focus of the clauses shifted from guaranteeing education rights to regulating education financial obligations on the government, which reflected the influence of strict rules in the modern Chinese constitutions. It also showed the special feature of modern Chinese constitutions in comparison with those of other countries.The evolution of educational financial rules in the constitutions reflected the complex relationship among different social groups. Modern education associations and political minorities played an important role in bringing the rules of educational budget into constitutional documents. They actively attracted attention to educational budget problems, set up the rules of educational budget and pushed the government to commit itself to its obligations. On the other hand, the authorities sometimes tolerated these strict rules under the strong pressure of other groups. When they were strong enough, they would evade their obligations by diminishing and cutting out some rules. The rules were not voluntarily accepted by people in power.The rules of educational budget provided legal guarantee to prevent abusing administrative power, so as to ensure educational rights for the people. The rules of educational budget aimed to serve as both a banner and a tool to protect educational rights. But there was a big gap between the reality and the ideal. The disjuncture between the constitution rules and actuality surely damaged the authority of the constitutions in the modern times. The contradiction showed that there was a long way to go to guarantee the basic educational rights.
作者 商丽浩
出处 《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第4期23-28,共6页 Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences
基金 全国优秀博士学位论文作者专项资金资助项目(200206)
关键词 教育经费 宪法 中国 China educational budget constitution
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1中华民国约法草案--太原扩会约法草案[A].荣孟源.中国国民党历次代表大会及中央全会资料:上[C].北京:光明日报出版社,1985.875-876.
  • 2中华民国训政时期约法[A].宋恩荣,章咸.中华民国教育法规选编[C].南京:江苏教育出版社,1990.47-78.
  • 3中华民国宪法草案[A].宋恩荣,章咸.中华民国教育法规选编[C].南京:江苏教育出版社,1990.64-65.
  • 4中华民国宪法[A].宋恩荣,章咸.中华民国教育法规选编[C].南京:江苏教育出版社,1990.69-70.
  • 5中华人民共和国宪法[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2002.
  • 6谢维雁.严格规则主义及其对中国宪政之影响[J].社会科学研究,2001(1):69-72. 被引量:12
  • 7贺卫方.癸未施政[N].南方周末,2003-03-13(2).
  • 8范源濂.论义务教育当规定于宪法[A].沈云龙.近代中国史料丛刊[Z].台北:文海出版社,1983.
  • 9中国第二历史档案馆.中华民国史档案资料汇编:第3辑[C].南京:江苏古籍出版社,1991.
  • 10戴学正.中外宪法选编:上册[C].北京:华夏出版社,1994.

二级参考文献10

  • 1程燎原.关于宪政的几个基本理论问题[J].现代法学,1999,21(4):62-67. 被引量:46
  • 2吕尚敏.论宪法规定中的程序性条款[J].江苏社会科学,1999(2):40-45. 被引量:11
  • 3徐国栋.民法基本原则解释[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1992.137-149.
  • 4[美]埃尔斯特 潘勤 谢鹏程 斯莱格斯塔德.宪政与民主[M].北京三联书店,1997..
  • 5[瑞士]托马斯·弗莱纳.人权是什么[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2000..
  • 6宋冰.程序、正义与现代化[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1998..
  • 7[法]勒内·达维德.当代主要法律体系[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1984.467.
  • 8梅里曼.大陆法系[M].重庆:西南政法学院印行,1983.p39.
  • 9[美]约翰·亨利·梅利曼.大陆法系[M].北京:知识出版社,1984.18.
  • 10[日]佐滕功.比较政治制度[M].法律出版社,1984.

共引文献14

同被引文献13

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部