期刊文献+

试析小学综合文科课程教材的编制与开发——以人教版《品德与社会》为例 被引量:2

The Compilation and Exploration into the Teaching Materials of Integrated Liberal Arts in Primary Schols——Take Moral and Society (PEP Edition) as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 教材的研究和开发是一个复杂的过程。我们试图以教材编制者的视角,从操作机制、教材的建构和参与、教材建构的理念、呈现形式等若干方面,梳理编制和开发人教版《品德与社会》群体在成就教材的过程中所坚持和追求的精神及理想。旨在以开放的心态,抛砖引玉,希望和更多的同仁共同探讨在《品德与社会》教材的编制和开发中,所共同面临的实际问题,拉近理想和现实的距离,为我们的儿童编制出一生受益的、高品质的教科书。 The process of developing and making research on the teaching materials is a very compli- cate one. We try to comb the spirit and beliefs during which Moral and Society (PEP edition) is being compiled and developed from the compilers' point of view in respect to operating system, construction and participation of teaching materials, formation of ideas, and methods of presentation. We hope to discuss with more colleagues openly the realistic problems confronted during compiling the textbooks of Moral and Society, and present our students good-quality and life-long benefit textbooks.
作者 郭雯霞
出处 《课程.教材.教法》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第6期52-56,共5页 Curriculum,Teaching Material and Method
关键词 教材编制者 建构 理论基础 教育关怀 teaching materials compiler construction theoretical base educational concern
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献8

  • 1Harre R. The rediscovery of the human mind: The discursive approach. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1999(2): 44
  • 2Kevin D. Social constructionism, discourse, and psychology. South African Journal of Psychology, 1997, 27(3): 175~183
  • 3Gergen K J. Social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 1985, (3): 269, 271
  • 4Harre R. Rethinking psychology. SAGE Publications, 1995. 146
  • 5Mark O. Science and individualism in educational psychology. Educational Psychology, 1993, 13(2): 155~173
  • 6Stam H. Personal-construct theory and social constructionism: Difference and dialogue. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 1998, 11: 196
  • 7Gergen K J. Realities and relationships: Soundings in social construction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994. 49
  • 8Hruby G G. Sociological, postmodern, and new realism perspective in social constructionism: Implications for literacy research. Reading Research Quarterly, 2001, 36(1): 48~63

共引文献155

同被引文献40

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部