摘要
"在前提中不周延的项,在结论中仍不得周延"这条推理规则在由直言命题组成的推理中是否普遍适用?这是一个在逻辑学中尚未得到解决的问题。本文旨在对这个问题提出一种解决方案。
Is it universally adequate that the reasoning rule 'if a term is not distributive in the premise, it is still not in the conclusion' in the reasoning consisting of categorical propositions? This is a question that has not been resolved in logic. My article tries to provide a key for the question.
出处
《西北大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2004年第4期95-98,共4页
Journal of Northwest University：Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
关键词
周延性
直言命题
普遍适用性
distribution
categorical proposition
universal adequacy
