期刊文献+

假言推理中的概率效应 被引量:2

Probability Effect in Conditional Inference
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近来Oaksford等人的研究表明,概率信息对假言推理的认知过程有着显著的影响,在一定程度上可以用它来解释和预测个体在推理中的行为反应。该文针对这种新的观点,就假言推理中所涉及的前后件概率信息、条件概率信息、连接概率信息、因果概率信息以及额外前提条件等对假言推理的影响分别做了简要的阐述,并介绍了一些相关的实验研究,最后作了总结和展望。 s: Recently a series of studies that made by Oaksford suggested that Probability information has a strong influence on cognitive process of conditional inference so that it can be used to explain and predict peoples reaction in inference. So this article reviewed probability effects that conclude probability of antecedent and consequent, conditional probability, conjunctive probability,causal probability and added antecedent in conditional inference and recommended some recently studies and viewpoints, at last made a summary and expectation.
作者 邱江 张庆林
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2004年第4期505-511,共7页 Advances in Psychological Science
关键词 假言推理 条件概率 连接概率 概率效应 conditional inference,conditional probability,conjunctive probability,probability effect.
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1[6]王甦,汪安圣. 认知心理学. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 1992. 238
  • 2[2]Oaksford M, Wakefield M. Data selection and natural sampling :Probabilities do matter. Memory & Cognition, 2003, 31 (1): 143~154
  • 3[3]Oaksford M, Chater N. Probabilities and polarity biases in Conditional Inference.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learing,Memory, Cogniton, 2000, 26(4): 883~899
  • 4[4]Evans B T, Twyman-Musgrove J. Conditonal reasoning with inducements and advice. Cognition, 1998, 69:B11~16
  • 5[5]Evans B T. Logic and Human Reasoning:An Assessment of the Deduction Paradigm. Psychological Bulletin,2002, 128(6): 978~996
  • 6[6]Oaksford M, Chater N. Computational Levels and Conditional InferenceL: Reply to Schroyens and Schaeken. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learing, Memory, Cogniton, 2003, 29(1): 150~156
  • 7[7]Evans B T, Simon J H. Conditionals and Conditional Probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learing, Memory, Cogniton,2003, 29(2): 321~335
  • 8[8]Johnson-Laird P N, Byrne M J. Conditionals:A Theory of Meaning,Pragmatics,and Inference. Psychological Review, 2002, 109(4):646~678
  • 9张庆林,王振勇,蒲晓容.条件推理中的命题语义加工[J].心理科学,1994,17(6):346-352. 被引量:19
  • 10刘志雅,赵冬梅,郑雪.假言推理的否定词效应[J].心理科学进展,2002,10(4):395-402. 被引量:5

二级参考文献20

  • 1张庆林,王振勇,蒲晓容.条件推理中的命题语义加工[J].心理科学,1994,17(6):346-352. 被引量:19
  • 2Braine M, O'Brien D. A theory of If: A lexical entry, reasoning program, and pragmatic principles. Psychological Review, 1991, 98: 182-203
  • 3Johnson-Laird P, Byrne R, Schaeken W. Prepositional reasoning by models. Psychological Review, 1992, 9: 418-439
  • 4Girotto V, Mazzocco A, Tasso A. The effect of premise order in conditional reasoning: a test of the mental model theory. Cognition, 1997, 63: 1-28
  • 5Evans J, Lynch J. Matching bias in the selection task. British Journal of Psychology, 1973, 64: 391-397
  • 6Evans J. The mental model theory of conditional reasoning: Critical appraisal and revision. Cognition, 1993, 48: 1-20
  • 7Oaksford M, Stenning K. Reasoning with conditionals containing negated constituents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1992, 18: 835-854
  • 8Schaeken W, Schroyens W. The effect of explicit negatives and of different contrast classes on conditional syllogisms. British Journal of Psychology, 2000, 91: 533-550
  • 9Oaksford M, Chater N. A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. Psychological Review, 1994, 101: 608-631
  • 10Oaksford M, Chater N, Larkin J. Probabilities and polarity biases in conditional inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2000, 26(4): 883-899

共引文献28

同被引文献16

  • 1刘志雅,赵冬梅,郑雪.假言推理的否定词效应[J].心理科学进展,2002,10(4):395-402. 被引量:5
  • 2GerdGigerenzer,包燕.生态学智力:人类的推理算法对频率的适应[J].心理学动态,2001,9(4):325-329. 被引量:4
  • 3邱江,张庆林.有关条件推理中概率效应的实验研究[J].心理科学,2005,28(3):554-557. 被引量:6
  • 4Oaksford M , Chater N, Larkin J. Probabilities and polarity biases in Conditional Inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learing ,Memory , Cogniton , 2000, 26 (4) : 883-899.
  • 5Schroyens W, Schaeken W. A critique of Oaksford, Chater, and Larkin's (2000) Conditional Probability Model of Conditional Reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learing, Memory, Cogniton , 2003, 29 (1) : 140 - 149.
  • 6Oaksford M Chater N. Computational Lavers and Conditional Inference: Reply to Schroyens and Schaeken (2003). Journal of ExperimentalPsyehology : Learing, Memory, Cogniton , 2003, 29 (1) : 150-156.
  • 7Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theoty: An analysis of decision under risk. Economica, 1979,47 (2).
  • 8Gigerenzer G, Hoffrage U.How to improve Bayesian reasoning: without frequency formats. Psychological Review, 1995.
  • 9Gigerenzer G, Hoffrage U. Overcoming difficulties in bayesian Reasoning: A reply to Lewis and Keren and Mellers and Mc-Graw. Psychological Review, 1999.
  • 10Oaksford M, Chater N. A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. Psychological Review, 1994, 101 : 608 - 631.

引证文献2

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部