期刊文献+

社会判断的选择可得性模型

A Selective Accessibility Model In Social Judgment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Mussweiler提出一个社会判断的选择可得性模型,它是以社会判断中比较结果的信息观为基础的。Mussweiler把这些信息基础概括为一个选择可得性模型,这个模型区分了两种基本的比较过程。相似性检验的选择是因为可获得的知识表明目标———标准的相似性,而不相似性检验的选择是因为可获得的知识表明目标———标准不相同。不同的目标知识是接下来目标评价的基础,因此相似性检验显然导致了同化,而不相似性检验则明显导致了对比。这个模型是一个统一的概念结构,它整合了社会判断中比较结果的各种发现。 Mussweiler proposes a selective accessibility model,which takes an informational perspective on comparison consequences in social judgment.It is argued that to understand the variable consequences of comparison,one has to examine what target knowledge is activated during the comparison process.This model distinguishes 2 fundamental comparison processes.Similarity testing selectively makes accessible knowledge indicate target standard similarity,whereas dissimilarity testing selectively makes accessible knowledge indicate target standard dissimilarity.These respective subsets of target knowledge build the basis for subsequent target evaluation,so that similarity testing typically leads to assimilition whereas dissimilarity testing typically leads to contrast.The model is proposed as a unifying conceptual framework that integrates diverse findings on comparison consequence in social judgment.
出处 《贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 2004年第4期74-77,共4页 Journal of Guizhou Normal University(Social Sciences)
关键词 社会判断 选择可得性 相似性检验 不相似性检验 social judgment selective accessibility similarity testing dissimilarity testing
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1[1]Kahneman, D. &Miller, D. T. Norm theory: Comparing reality toits alternatives[ J ]. Psychology Review, 1986.
  • 2[2]Dehaene, S. Naccache, L. LeClec ' H, G. Koechlin, E. Imaging unconscious semantic priming[ J ]. Nature, 1998.
  • 3[3]Herr, P. M. Consequences of priming: Judgment and behavior[ J ]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986 .
  • 4[4]Morse, S., &G, ergen, K. J. Social comparison, self - consistency, and the concept of sclf[ J ]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970.
  • 5[5]Pelham, B. W., &Wachsmuth, J. O. The waxing and waning of the social self: Assimilation and contrast in social comparison[ J ]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995.
  • 6[6]Mussweiler,T. , & Bodenhausen, G. I know you are but what am I? Self- evaluative consequences of judging in -group and out -group members [ J ]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2002.
  • 7[7]Brown, J. D. , Novick, N. J. , Lord, K. A. ,&Richards, J. M. When Gulliver travels: Social context, psychological closeness, and self - appraisals[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1992.
  • 8[8]Mussweiler,T. Focus of comparison as a determinant of assimilation versus contrast in social comparison [ J ]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin ,2001.
  • 9[9]Mussweiler,T. Comparison processes in social judgment:Mechanisms and consequences[J]. Psychological Review,2003.
  • 10[10]Higgins, E. T. Knowledge activation: Accessibility,applicability,and salience. In E. T. Higgins&A. W. Kruglanski ( Eds. ), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principle. New York:Guilford Press, 1996.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部