1Landis SH, Murray T, Bolden S, et al. Cancer statistics.1998, CA Cancer J Clin, 1998,48:6-29.
2Kopans DB, Moore RH, McCarthy KA, et al. Positive predictive value of breast biopsy performed as a result of mammography: there is no abrupt change at age 50 years. Radiology, 1996,200:357-360.
3Verkooijen HM, Peeters PH, Buskens E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer, 2000, 82:1017-1021.
4Verkooijen HM. Core Biopy after Radiological Localisation (COBRA) Study Group. Diagnostic accuracy of stereotactic large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: results of multi center prospective study 95% surgical confirmation. Int J Cancer,
5Ball CG, Butchart M, MacFarlane JK, et al. Effect on biopsy technique of the breast imaging reporting and data system(BI-RADS) for nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities. Can J Surg, 2002,45:259-263.
6Liberman L, Abramson AF, Squires FB, et al. The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1998,171:35-40.
7Liberman L. Impact of percutaneous imaging-guided core biopsy on the clinical management of breast disease. In:Rosen PP, ed. Breast pathology diagnosis by needle core biopsy. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1999.291-292.
8Fajardo L. Equipment consideration: stereotaxic and digital systems. In: Dershaw DD, ed. Interventional breast procedures. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1996.45-53.
9Dershaw DD, Fleischman RC, Liberman L, et al. Use of digital mammography in needle localization procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1993,161:559-562.
10Berg WA, Krebs TL, Campassi C, et al. Evaluation of 14-and 11- gauge directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy probes and 14-guage biopsy guns in a breast parenchymal model. Radiology, 1997,205:203-208.
