期刊文献+

左西替利嗪与西替利嗪治疗慢性荨麻疹多中心随机双盲对照研究 被引量:53

A Multi-center Randomized Double-blind Comparative Clinical Trial of Levocetirizine and Cetirizine for the Treatment of Chronic Idiopathetic Urticaria
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究和比较左西替利嗪和西替利嗪治疗慢性荨麻疹的疗效和安全性。方法选择慢性荨麻疹患者为研究对象,采用多中心、随机、双盲、对照临床研究。试验组盐酸左西替利嗪片每日1次,每次5mg,对照组盐酸西替利嗪片每日1次,每次10mg,均连续服用28d。分别于用药后第7、14、28天随访,观察疗效和不良反应。结果入选病例132例,可评价疗效和安全性病例均为130例。ITT分析左西替利嗪组治疗后第7、14、28天有效率分别为73.44%、82.81%、89.06%,西替利嗪组有效率分别为77.27%、81.82%、81.82%,两组比较差异无显著性。左西替利嗪组和西替利嗪组不良反应发生率分别为14.06%和18.18%,主要有口干、嗜睡。结论左西替利嗪治疗慢性荨麻疹安全有效。 Objective To investigate and compare the effect and safety of levocetirizine and cetirizine for the treatment of chronic idiopathetic urticaria (CIU). Methods A multi-center, randomized and double-blind comparative clinical trial was employed. The patients with CIU were divided into levocetirizine group and cetirizine group. Levocetirizine (5mg/day) or cetirizine (10mg/day) were taken once daily for 28 days, and were followed up on the 7th day, 14th day and 28th day after starting treatment. Results One hundred and thirty cases were evaluable for the effect and safety at the end of the study. The effective rates in levocetirizine group and in cetirizine group were 73.44% and 77.27% on the 7th day after treatment, 82.81% and 81.82% on the 14th day, and 89.06% and 81.82% at the end of the therapy respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups. The drug adverse reaction for levocetirizine group and cetirizine group were 14.06% and 18.18% respectively, which include mouth dryness, dizziness etc. Conclusion Levocetirizine is an effective and safe agent for the treatment of CIU.
出处 《中华皮肤科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第6期320-322,共3页 Chinese Journal of Dermatology
关键词 左西替利嗪 西替利嗪 药物治疗 慢性荨麻疹 疗效 安全性 抗组胺药 Hydroxyzine Urticaria Randomized controlled trials
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Gillard M,Van der Perren C,Massingham R,et al.Binding characteristics of [3H]levocetirizine to cloned human H1-histamine-receptors expressed in CHO cells.Inflamm Res,2002,51 Suppl 1:S77-S78.
  • 2Devalia JL,De Vos C,Hanotte F,et al.A randomized,doubleblind,crossover comparison among cetirizine,levocetirizine,and ucb 28557 on histamine-induced cutaneous responses in healthy adult volunteers.Allergy,2001,56:50-57.
  • 3Wang DY,Hanotte F,De Vos C,et al.Effect of cetirizine,levocetirizine,and dextrocetirizine on histamine-induced nasal response in healthy adult volunteers.Allergy,2001,56:339-343.
  • 4Clough GF,Boutsiouki P,Church MK.et al.Comparison of the effects of levocetirizine and loratadine on histamine-induced wheal,flare,and itch in human skin.Allergy,2001,56:985-988.
  • 5Thomson L,Blaylock MG,Sexton DW,et al.Cetirizine and levocetirizine inhibit eotaxin-induced eosinophil transendothelial migration through human dermal or lung microvascular endothelial cells.Clin Exp Allergy,2002,32:1187-1192.
  • 6Leynadier F,Mees K,Arendt C,et al.Efficacy and safety of levocetirizine in seasonal allergic rhinitis.Acta Otorhinolaryngnl Belg,2001,55:305-312.
  • 7刘玲玲,朱学骏,姜薇,陈喜雪,李明,彭振辉,郭在培,李福秋.咪唑斯汀治疗慢性荨麻疹的随机双盲研究[J].中华皮肤科杂志,2003,36(6):306-309. 被引量:149
  • 8Baltes E,Coupez R,Giezek H,et al.Absorption and disposition of levocetirizine,the eutomer of cetirizine,administered alone or as cetirizine to healthy volunteers.Fundam Clin Pharmacol,2001,15:269-277.
  • 9Gandon JM,Allain H.Lack of effect of single and repeated doses of levocetirizine,a new antihistamine drug,on cognitive and psychomotor functions in healthy volunteers.Br J Clin Pharmacol,2002,54: 51-58.

二级参考文献7

  • 1张宏誉,李宏,岳凤敏,王良录,方权,王瑞琦,秦万章,李明,金岚,秦立模,吴惠俐.咪唑斯汀治疗慢性特发性荨麻疹的多中心随机平行组对照的临床试验报告[J].中华微生物学和免疫学杂志,2001,21(S2):61-64. 被引量:11
  • 2Pichat P;Angel I;Arbilla S.Anti-inflammatory properties of mizolastine after oral administration on arachidonic acid-induced cutaneous reaction in the rat,1998(01).
  • 3Benavides J;Schoemaker H;Dana C.In vivo and in vitro interaction of the novel selective histamine H1 receptor antagonist mizolastine with H1 receptors in the rodent,1995.
  • 4Dubertr;Murrieta Aguttes M;Tonet J.Efficacy and safety of mizolastine 10 mg in a placebo-controlled comparison with loratadine in chronic idiopathic urticaria:results of the MILOR Study[J],1999.
  • 5Sabbah A;Daele J;Wade AG.Comparison of the efficacy,safety,and onset of action of mizolastine,cetirizine,and placebo in the management of seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.MIZOCET Study Group[J],1999.
  • 6Leynadier F;Duarte-Risselin C;Murrieta M.Comparative therapeutic effect and safety of mizolastine and loratadine in chronic idiopathic urticaria URTILOR study group,2000.
  • 7朱大勋.咪唑斯汀和四种常用H_1受体阻滞剂的实验抗组胺强度比较[J].中华皮肤科杂志,2001,34(3):219-220. 被引量:36

共引文献148

同被引文献248

引证文献53

二级引证文献304

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部