期刊文献+

杜威与施瓦布的科学本质观与科学教育观比较 被引量:10

Comparison of Dewey's Views of the Nature of Science and Science Education with Schwab's
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章从社会学视角比较分析了杜威与施瓦布在科学本质观上的异同及成因,以及二者为把相应科学本质观传达给学生,而提出的改革课程与教学的主张,并在此基础上探讨了他们对如何看待科学本质,以及对我国当前课程改革的启示。 This paper compares the differences and similarities of views of the nature of science and the causes between Dewey and Schwab from the perspective of sociology. Their claims to reform curriculum and instruction in order to convey correspondingly the nature of science to students are also analyzed. On the basis,its implications for how to regard the nature of science and our current curriculum reform are further explored.
作者 徐学福
出处 《外国教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第7期14-18,共5页 Studies in Foreign Education
关键词 杜威 施瓦布 科学本质 科学教育 J.Dewey J.J.Schwab the nature of science science education
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1J. Dewey. Science as subject-matter and as method[J].Science, 1910,31(787): 121-127.
  • 2J. Dewey. Method in science teaching[J]. General Science Quarterly, 1916,1(1) :3-9.
  • 3J. Dewey. Democracy and education[M]. New York:Macmillan, 1916. 189.
  • 4J. Dewey. Science as subject-matter and as method [J].Science,1910,31(787) : 121-127.
  • 5J. Dewey. Progress. International Journal of Ethics[J].1916,26(3):311-322.
  • 6J. Dewey. Method in science teaching[J]. Science Education, 1945,29(3) : 119-123.
  • 7J. J. Schwab. The teaching of science as enquiry. In P F Brandwein(Ed.),The teaching of science [M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962.
  • 8J. J. Schwab. The teaching of science as inquiry [J].Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 1958,14:374-379.
  • 9J. J. Schwab. The structure of natural science[A]. In G W Ford,L Pungo(Eds.) The structure of knowledge and the curriculum[C]. Chicago:Rand McNaUy,1964. 31-49.
  • 10National Science Foundation. Annual report for fiscal year [R]. Washington, DC. National Science Foundation,1963. 12.

同被引文献65

引证文献10

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部