期刊文献+

区域可持续发展评价——以拉萨地区为例 被引量:23

A study on the assessment of sustainable regional development in Lhasa area
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文依据区域可持续发展评价的理论模型和区域发展的目标体系 ,构建了拉萨地区可持续发展评价的指标体系 ,并对拉萨地区 4 0年来的发展历程进行了评价。评价揭示了拉萨地区社会经济发展水平不断提高、但自然环境对社会经济发展的支持能力却在持续下降的动态历程 ,并鉴明了人均耕地面积持续下降、草场退化、土地沙化、以生物质能源为主的能源消耗结构、居民收入差距增大、人口出生率高、人口文化素质较低等因素是拉萨地区发展的不可持续性因子。 Based on the idea that socioeconomic development and health of environment are two integral goals of sustainable regional development, a theoretical frame defined by two coordinate axes of development and sustainability is developed. Development consists of three sub goals of regional social development, economic development and demographic change; and sustainability concerns three subsystems: the health of environment or the support capability of resources, life support system and biodiversity. Using up down and bottom up approaches and this theoretical framework, the system of 18 indicators for evaluating sustainable development in Lhasa area was developed. The assessment of Lhasa area during 1960 to 1999 revealed that: 1) Socioeconomic development in Lhasa area (1995~1999)was remarkable, and the development index was improved by 36%. The index of economic development in the 1990s increased 3.9 times compared to that in the 1960s, and the index of demographic development increased 58% simultaneously. But the index of social development decreased due to the enlarging gap of resident incomes. 2) The index of sustainability reduced from 0.76 of 1960~1964 to 0.61 of 1995~1999, a decrease of 19.37%. That means the support capability of environment to the regional development decreased. 3) Using barometer of sustainability, regional development and its sustainability can be pictured in four different quadrants of this theoretical frame: weak sustainability, almost weak sustainability, almost unsustainability, and unsustainability. The assessment results show that regional development process of Lhasa area in the past 40 years was almost weak sustainable. Although the indices of development and sustainability fluctuated in different periods, the tendency of regional development can be clearly reflected. With the rapid socioeconomic development, the index of development will be improved highly in the future. But the index of sustainability cannot decrease further; otherwise Lhasa area cannot realize the goal of sustainable development. 4) To identify the unfavorable factors, indicators that score less than 0.75 or whose score decrease continuously are defined as unsustainable indicators. Thus the following unfavorable factors were recognized: the decrease of arable land per capita, land desertification, degradation of grassland, dependency of bio fuel, enlarging gap of resident incomes, high population growth rate, and high illiteracy rate and low education level of resident etc. The future development strategy should aim to alleviate the restrictions of these unfavorable factors.
作者 李利锋 郑度
出处 《地理研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2004年第4期551-560,共10页 Geographical Research
基金 国家重点基础研究规划项目 (G19980 4 0 80 0 )
关键词 拉萨 区域可持续发展 评价 指标体系 Lhasa area sustainability assessment indicators for sustainable development barometer of sustainability
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Thaddeus C. Trzyna (Eds.). A sustainable world: Defining and measuring sustainable development. Published for IUCN-The World Conservation Union by the International Center for the Environment and Public Policy, California Institute of Public Affairs. Sacr
  • 2Cobb C. The index of sustainable economic welfare. In: Daly H E and Cobb J B. (Eds.). For the Common Good.Boston: Beacon Press, 1989. 401-455.
  • 3Hardi P, Barg S. Measuring sustainable development: reviewing of current practice. Ottawa: Industry Canada, 1997.
  • 4Hicks, John Richard. Value and capital. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1946.
  • 5The World Bank. Monitoring Environmental Progress: A Report on Work in Progress. New York: The World Bank, 1995.
  • 6UNDP. Human Development Report, 1990, 1991, 1994, 1995, 1997. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • 7Wackernagel Mathis Rees, William E. Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. Gabriola Island, B.C. , Canada: New Society Publishers, 1996.
  • 8Hu Tao. Eco-value and sustainable development. In: Wang Rusong, Zhao Jingzhu, Ouyang Zhiyuan(Eds. ). Human Systems Ecology. Beijing: China Science & Technology Press, 1991. 235-236.
  • 9Victousek P, Ehrlich P, Enrlich A, et al. Human appropriation of the products of photosynthesis. Bioscience,1986, 34: 368-373.
  • 10OECD.Environmental Indicators:OECD Core Set.Paris:OECD,1994.

二级参考文献65

共引文献1723

同被引文献407

引证文献23

二级引证文献186

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部