摘要
本文试图通过比较米歇尔·福柯和以赛亚·伯林处理癫狂、非理性、理性、消极自由、权力、强制等相似难题中表现的各自特点 ,说明当代思想家在反省自近代启蒙以来人类“他者事业”面临的艰难困境 ,进而讨论罗蒂、德里达、罗尔斯、德沃金等人在解答福柯—伯林难题时提供的不同解决方案 ,探讨在挽救“非理性”事业中采取与居于主导地位的“理性事业”
This paper tries to compare the characteristics and strategies of Michel Foucault and Isaiah Berlin who want to deal with some problematics such as madness, irrationality, reason, liberty, power, and coercion. It explains what difficulties both thinkers are confronted with when they reflect on others' enterprises since the Enlightenment. Then it reviews the different solutions which Richard Rorty, Jacques Derrida, John Rawls, and Ronald Dworkin provide to answer Foucault Berlin problematics. Finally, it explores the possibilities to save others' enterprises in the light of some moderate alternatives and strategies to co operate with the sovereign enterprises of reason.
出处
《复旦学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2004年第4期62-70,共9页
Fudan Journal（Social Sciences）
关键词
福柯
伯林
理性
消极自由
他者
癫狂
Michel Foucault, Isaiah Berlin, reason, irrationality, negative freedom, other, madness.
