摘要
The increasing body of literature in evolutionary psychology and neuroscience in the last ten years supports the following propositions:(1)There are much closer connections between rational choice and moral judgement than traditionally thought;(2)Such connections are formed during the long evolution of human society;(3)For human species the brain structure and the social structure are co\|evolutionary;(4)The psycho\|physiological foundation of moral judgement are “theory of mind” and social cognition;(5)The psycho\|physiological foundation of rational choice are episodic and semantic memory.These propositions have been explained in the so\|called the “third culture” rhetoric which differs from that of scientific(the first)culture and the humanity(the second)culture.The third culture is itself an interdisciplinary rhetoric and dialogue of logos.
The increasing body of literature in evolutionary psychology and neuroscience in the last ten years supports the following propositions:(1)There are much closer connections between rational choice and moral judgement than traditionally thought;(2)Such connections are formed during the long evolution of human society;(3)For human species the brain structure and the social structure are co\|evolutionary;(4)The psycho\|physiological foundation of moral judgement are “theory of mind” and social cognition;(5)The psycho\|physiological foundation of rational choice are episodic and semantic memory.These propositions have been explained in the so\|called the “third culture” rhetoric which differs from that of scientific(the first)culture and the humanity(the second)culture.The third culture is itself an interdisciplinary rhetoric and dialogue of logos.
出处
《社会学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2004年第4期31-38,共8页
Sociological Studies
