摘要
刑事案件普通程序简化审是 96刑诉法实施后 ,公正与效率双重价值追求在司法实践中的体现。其中所凸现的问题是被告人缺乏律师帮助 ,参与诉讼的“理性”程度相对较低 ;而相应的司法资源不足导致救济措施落实不到位。简化审实践中出现的检察官在审前向被告人出示主要证据 ,与被告人进行审前认罪及选择庭审方式的对话 ,在法庭上对被告人应处刑罚提出具体的量刑建议等做法 ,虽不失为有效措施 ,但法律依据似是而非 ,正当性的论证还不足 ,值得在实践中进一步探索。
With the application of Criminal Procedure Law(1996), the simplified trial of general procedure in criminal cases was put in practice in order to reveal the perusal of value of justice and efficiency in the judicial practice. But with the lack of lawyer's help to the accused and aid measures of judicial resources and weak justness with deficient legal bases, it needs more exploration in the practice.
出处
《广西政法管理干部学院学报》
2004年第5期53-56,共4页
Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
