期刊文献+

股东派生诉讼的合理性基础与制度设计 被引量:79

股东派生诉讼的合理性基础与制度设计
原文传递
导出
摘要 股东派生诉讼制度在多个方面突破了法律的一般规则 ,这不仅是法律因应保护少数股东权之现实需要而作出的变通 ,而且有深刻的制度背景、思想条件和政治学基础。我国股东派生诉讼制度尚付阙如的现状已严重影响了公司治理结构的改善。在导入该制度时应遵循保护少数股东权利、公司自治与国家干预相平衡、鼓励正当诉讼与防止投机诉讼相协调、借鉴国外先进经验与协调国内法律体系相兼顾原则 ,并将之落实在具体内容的构建之中。 Derivative action has made several breakthroughs to general legal doctrines. The introduction of this system is not only to give enough protection for minority shareholders, but also has broad system circumstances, ideology preconditions, political and economical bases. In China, the fact of the lack of such action has already impeded the improvement of our corporate governance. While introducing the derivative action system, we should abide by the principles of protecting rights of minority shareholders, of balancing corporation's self-autonomy and government's regulation, of counterpoising encouraging proper suit and holding back strike suit, of harmonizing foreign advanced experience with domestic legal system, and carry out the forgoing principles into concrete contents.
作者 胡滨 曹顺明
出处 《法学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第4期92-103,共12页 Chinese Journal of Law
关键词 股东派生诉讼制度 公司治理结构 诉讼权利 股东权利 公司制度 derivative action, theoretical base, practical motivity
  • 相关文献

参考文献42

  • 1See L. C. B. Gower, D. D. Prentice, B. G. Pettet, Gower' s Principles of Modern Company Law, Sweet & Maxwell, 1992, p.647.p.644.
  • 2Robert C. Clark, Corporate Law, Little, Brown & Company, 1986, p.639.p653
  • 3Michael A. Collora, David M. Osborne, A Derivative Claim by Any Other Name: Direct Claims to Remedy Wrongdoing in Close Corporations, (2000) Securities News, No'.2.
  • 4Foss v. Harbottle, ( 1843)2 Hare 461.
  • 5See Pearlie Koh Ming Choo, The Statutory Derivative Action in Singapore A Critical and Comparative Examination,http://www.bond.edu.au/law/blr/wol13-1/koh.polf.
  • 6See P. Anisman, Majority - Minority Relation in Canadian Corporation Law: An Overview, (1986-1987) Can. Bus. L. J. p.473.
  • 7S.M.Watson, Directors' Duties in New Zealand, (1998) the Journal of Business Law, p.495.
  • 8Roger Meiners, Piercing the Veil of Limited Liability, (1979) 4 Del. J. Corp. L, p.351.
  • 9See Stephen P. Ferris, Robert M. Lawless, Anil K. Makhija, Derivative Lawsuits as a Corporate Governance Mechanism: Empirical Evidence on Board Changes Surrounding Filings, (2001) CORI Working Paper No. 01-03.
  • 10Harry G. Henn,John R. Alexander, Laws of Corporations, West Publishing Company, 1983, p.115.p.1049

二级参考文献16

共引文献387

同被引文献789

引证文献79

二级引证文献308

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部