期刊文献+

4~6岁儿童直接推理能力及策略的实验研究 被引量:5

An Experiment on the Direct Inference Ability and Strategies of 4~6 Year-old Children
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用定量与定性相结合的研究方法 ,对 4~ 6岁儿童的直接推理能力进行了实验研究 ,结果表明 :(1)学前儿童萌发了语言条件下的直接推理能力 ,但年龄发展效应并不明显 ;(2 )对于学前儿童而言 ,否定前提下的直接推理并不比肯定前提下的难。但是 ,如果进行了反义词的转换 ,同样的任务 ,却增加了肯定前提下直接推理的任务难度 ,而对否定前提下的直接堆理没有影响 ;(3)学前儿童在直接推理时多种策略并存。随着年龄的增长 ,有效策略的生成能力有了明显的提高 ,但有效策略的使用能力并没有与有效策略的生成能力同步发展 ,而是表现为落后的趋势。 The purpose of the study was to investigate the development of elementary schoolers in direct inference and analyze the strategies children used during reasoning.The participants were 72 children randomly selected from kindergartens including three groups aged 4,5 and 6 with an equal number of boys and girls in each group.The tests were carried out individually.The methodology of the study was characterized by qualitative and quantitative analyses.The results showed that:(1)children bourgeoned this kind of direct inference ability,but with no significant developmental effects of age;(2)the cognitive capacity under an affirmative premise was no better than that under a negative premise.If there was semantic reverse between the premise and problem,the task's difficulty under affirmative premises increased.(3)the capacity of creating effective strategy increased with age,but the capacity of using effective strategy did not increase simnltaneously.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2003年第2期228-231,共4页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 教育部人文社科研究基地重大项目的资助
关键词 4-6岁儿童 直接推理能力 实验研究 肯定前提 否定前提 学前儿童 推理策略 认知 children,direct inference,affirmative premise,negative premise,strategy
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Piaget J, Inhelder B,Szeminska A. The child's conception of geometry. London, Routledge, 1960
  • 2Bryant P E,Trabasso T. Transitive inference and memory in young children. Nature, 1971,232: 456 ~ 458
  • 3Halford G S, Galloway W. Children who fail to make transitive inferences can rember comparisons. Australian Journal of Psychology, 1977,29:1 ~ 5
  • 4Russell J. Children' s memory for the premises in a transitive measurement task assessed by elicited and spontaneous justifications. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1981,31: 300~ 309
  • 5Brainerd C,Kingma J. Do children have to remember to reason? A fuzzy-trace theory of transitivity development. Developmental Review, 1984, (4) :311~377
  • 6刘英茂.中文字句的理解与阅读.中国语文的心理学研究.文鹤出版有限公司,1982:9-84
  • 7Liu I. M. Sentence comprehension in Chinese and English.In H. S. R. Kao & R. Hoosain(Eds. ) ,Psychological Studies of the Chinese Language(pp. 181 - 217). The Chinese Language Society of Hong Kong
  • 8陈永明 彭瑞祥.句子理解的实验研究[J].心理学报,1990,(3):225-231.
  • 9缪小春,桑标.量词肯定句和否定句的理解[J].心理学报,1992,24(3):232-239. 被引量:8

二级参考文献2

共引文献8

同被引文献107

引证文献5

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部