期刊文献+

考古学的文化传统与开展社会考古学的可能性

The Cultural Tradition of Archaeolegy and the Possibility of Developing Social Archaeology
原文传递
导出
摘要 One of the fruits of the post-processual archaeology is that practitioners begin to realize the importance of "social" factors in the development of human societies. But this raised furious arguments on whether archaeologists can sensibly speak of society, and of the repertoire of concepts and categories that go with it. The discussion here concerns only Paleolithic archaeological records. The bulk of the paper is directed to three issues. First, an excursion into the cultural traditions of the discipline to consider why Paleolithic archaeologists fell compelled to pursue social archaeology. Scond, a discussion of the role of archaeological epistemology in allowing us a framework within which to assess the consequences of this pursuit. Third, a sketch of an alternative programme for Paleolithic archaeology which seeks to re-define to programme of social archaeology away from a simplistic application of contemporary social theory to archaeological data. One of the fruits of the post-processual archaeology is that practitioners begin to realize the importance of 'social' factors in the development of human societies. But this raised furious arguments on whether archaeologists can sensibly speak of society, and of the repertoire of concepts and categories that go with it. The discussion here concerns only Paleolithic archaeological records. The bulk of the paper is directed to three issues. First, an excursion into the cultural traditions of the discipline to consider why Paleolithic archaeologists fell compelled to pursue social archaeology. Second, a discussion of the role of archaeological epistemology in allowing us a framework within which to assess the consequences of this pursuit. Third, a sketch of an alternative programme for Paleolithic archaeology which seeks to re-define the programme of social archaeology away from a simplistic application of contemporary social theory to archaeological data.
作者 Tim Murray
出处 《考古》 CSSCI 北大核心 2003年第3期82-87,共6页 Archaeology
关键词 旧石器考古学 社会考古学 本体论 考古资料 人类学 Paleolithic archaeology social archaeology archaeological ontology archaeological epistemology
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Murry, Tim, Ethnoarchaeology or Palaeoethnology? In Archaeology with Ethnography,edited by B. Meehan and R. Jones, pp. 1-16, Research School of Pacific Studies: Canberra, 1988.
  • 2Murray, Tim and. M.J. Walker, Like What? A Practical Question of Analogical Inference and Archaeological Meaningfulness,Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 7:248-287, 1988.
  • 3Stocking, G.C. Jr., The Ethnographer's magic:Fieldwork in British Anthropology from Tylor to Malinowski, In Observers Observed,Essays on Ethnographic Fieldwork, edited by G.C. Stocking Jr., pp. 70-120, University of Wisconsin Press : Madison, 1983.
  • 4Sollas, W.J., Ancient Hunters and Their Modern Representatives, Macmillan, London, 1911.
  • 5Lee, R.B and Devore, I. (eds.), Man the Hunter, Aldine, Chicago, 1968.
  • 6Binford, L.R., Post-Pleistocene Adaptations,In New Perspectives in Archaeology, edited by S.R. and L.R. Binford, pp. 313-341,Aldine, Chicago, 1968.
  • 7Steward, J. H, Causal Factors and Processes in the Evolution of Pre-farming Societies. In Man the Hunter, edited by R.B. Lee and I. Deyore, pp. 321--334. Chicago, Aldine, 1968.
  • 8Davidson, I., Can We Study Prehistoric Economy for Fisher-gatherer-hunters? In Economic archaeology : Towards an Integration of Ecological and Social Approaches, edited by A.Sheridan and G. Bailey, pp. 17--33, Bar International Series 96, Oxford, 1990.
  • 9Renfrew, C., Approaches to Social Archaeology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.), 1984.
  • 10Koyama,S. and D. H. Thomas(eds.),Affluent Foragers, Senti Ethnological Series 9,National Museum of Ethnology, Osaka, 1982.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部