期刊文献+

局灶性脑缺血再灌注中c-Fos,胶质纤维酸性蛋白的表达和神经保护 被引量:1

Expressions of c-Fos and glial fibrillary acidic protein following focal cerebral ischemia reperfusion and their neuroprotection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究c-Fos和胶质纤维酸性蛋白(glialfibrillaryacidicprotein,GFAP)在局灶性脑缺血再灌注中的表达,尼莫地平脑保护作用的时机。方法:采用线栓法大脑中动脉闭塞90min加双侧颈总动脉结扎60min造模,18只SD大鼠随机等分为6组:对照组,I-R组,预防组,缺血治疗组,I-R治疗组,再灌注后治疗组。尼莫地平颈内动脉给药,再灌注后24h行脑功能障碍评分,再灌注72h处死测量脑组织梗死体积,并行苏木精-伊红染色,c-Fos,GFAP免疫组化染色。另选18只动物,I-R组9只和I-R治疗组9只各再分为再灌注后2,24和48h,行苏木精-伊红染色,c-Fos,GFAP免疫组化染色。结果:苏木精-伊红染色示预防组,I-R治疗组,再灌注后治疗组较之I-R组缺血半暗区神经元损伤明显减轻。再灌24h后神经功能障碍评分为:缺血治疗组(2.3±0.8)分≥I-R组(2.2±1.0)分>再灌注后治疗组(1.8±0.6)分>预防组(1.5±1.2)分>I-R治疗组(1.3±0.5)分>对照组(0.8±1.1)分,治疗组中除缺血治疗组外均较I-R组梗死体积小,但较对照组大,差异有统计学意义。治疗组皮质缺血半暗带,海马CA1区GFAP阳性细胞数均较I-R组少(P<0.05),但齿状回减少程度较轻;给药后皮质缺血半暗带以及海马各区c-Fos阳性细胞数明显减少。GFAP在再灌注2h大量表达,48h达高峰,且反应性星型胶质细胞居多,72h持续? AIM:To investigate the expressions of c Fos and glial fibrillary acidic protein(GFAP) after focal cerebral ischemia reperfusion(I R) and the suitable neuroprotective opportunities of nimodipine. METHODS:Model was established with middle cerebral artery occlusion for 90 minutes and suture occlusion with bilateral common carotid artery ligation for 60 minutes.Eighteen SD rats were divided into 6 groups randomly and equally(n=3):control group,I R group,prevention group,ischemia treatment group,I R treatment group and post-reperfusion treatment group.Nimodipine was injected by an intracarotid route.The disordered brain function and the brain infarct volumes were evaluated at 24 hours and 72 hours after the reperfusion respectively.Hemotoxylin and eosin staining(HE staining),c Fos and GFAP immonohistochemiscal staining were performed simultaneously.Another 18 animal models were equally divided into two groups,I R and I R treatment groups,each group with 3 subgroups:2 hour group(A1 group),24 hour group(A2 group) and 48 hour group(A3 group) after reperfusion,and HE staining, c Fos and GFAP immonohistochemiscal staining were performed. RESULTS:HE staining showed penumbra neuron damages were alleviated significantly in prevention group,I R treatment group and post reperfusion treatment group as compared with those of I R group.After 24 hours of reperfusion,the scores of neurological dysfuctions took turns as follows: 2.3±0.8 for ischemia treatment group ≥2.2±1.0 for I R group >1.8±0.6 for postreperfusion treatment group >1.5±1.2 for prevention group >1.3±0.5 for I R treatment group >0.8±1.1 for control group.Infarct volume of treatment groups except that of ischemia treatment group decreased significantly as compared with that of I R group,while increased as compared with that of control group.There were statistical differences.GFAP positive cells in cortex penumbra and CA1 were less than those of I R group(P< 0.05),but there were gentle reductions of the number in dentate gyrus. The number of c Fos positive cells in the same regions decreased significantly after treatment. Following reperfusion,GFAP clearly expressed at 2 hours, peaked at 48 hours and persisted at 72 hours when the reactive astrocytes were the most,while c Fos responsed strongly at 2 hours,still expressed massively at 24 hours,decreased significantly at 48 hours,and expressed in small quantity at 72 hours. CONCLUSION:Preventive and earlier reperfusion intracarotid nimodipine infusion has better therapeutic efficacy on focal cerebral I R.Reactive glial cells play important roles in the neuron survivals after ischemia reperfusion. Gene c Fos may take part in the signal transduction of cerebral ischemia injury.
出处 《中国临床康复》 CSCD 2004年第19期3810-3812,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1[2]Gomes FC, Paulin D, Moura Neto V. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP): modulation by growth factors and its implication in astrocyte differentiation. Braz J Med Biol Res 1999;32(5): 619 -31
  • 2[3]Zea Longa E, Weinstein PR, Carlson S, et al. Reversible middle cerebral artery occlusion without craniectomy in rats. Stroke 1989; 20( 1 ): 84 - 91
  • 3郭佳,张莉.脑缺血耐受与针灸的脑保护作用[J].中国临床康复,2002,6(1):116-117. 被引量:27
  • 4[5]Westenbroek RE, Bausch SB, Lin RC, et al. upregulation of L-type Ca2 + channels in reactive astrocytes after brain injury, hypomyelination and ischemia. J Neurosci1998; 18(7): 2321 -34
  • 5宋岳涛,唐一鹏,洪庆涛.抗呆I号对体外模拟脑缺血再灌注损伤星形胶质细胞的影响[J].中国临床康复,2004,8(1):110-111. 被引量:10
  • 6[7]Tumer R, Tjian R. Leucine repeats and adjacent DNA bind domain mediate the formation of functional c-Fos-c-Jun heterodimers. Science 1989;51:1689 -94
  • 7[8]Laping NJ, Teter B, Nichols NR, et al. glial fibrillary acidic protein: regulation by hormones, cytokines, and growth factors. Brain Pathol 1994; 1:259 - 75
  • 8[9]Morgan JI, Curren T. Immediate-early genes; ten years on. Trends Neurosci 1995;18(2):66-7
  • 9张秋玲,李亚鲁,张旺信,邢国庆,明晓云.预防性应用氟桂利嗪对实验性脑缺血模型神经细胞的保护[J].中国临床康复,2003,7(19):2652-2653. 被引量:6

二级参考文献38

共引文献40

同被引文献12

  • 1马莉.N-已酰半胱氨酸对大鼠脑梗死灶体积及caspase-1蛋白表达的影响[J].中国康复理论与实践,2005,11(4):273-275. 被引量:3
  • 2黄旭昇,朱克.缺血性脑血管病基础研究新进展[J].国外医学(脑血管疾病分册),1995,3(1):3-7. 被引量:17
  • 3Khan M,Sekhon M,Jalana M,et al.Administration of N-acetylcysleine after focal cerebral ischemia protects brain and reduces inflammation in a rat model of experimental stroke[J].Neurosci Res,2004,76(4):519-527.
  • 4Longa EZ,Weinstein PR,Carlson S,et al.Reversible middle cerebral arteryocclusion without craniectomy in rats[J].Stroke,1989,20(1):84-91.
  • 5Guo HF,Wang XM,Wang Q.Proto-oncogane and signed transduction[A].In:Hem JS.Shenjing Kexue Yuanli[M].2st ed.Beijing:Beijing Yike Daxue Zhongguo Xiehe Yike Daxue Lianhe Chubanshe,1999:410-417.
  • 6Angel P,karin M.The role of Jun,Fos and the AP-1 complex in cell-proliferatian and transformation[J].Biochem biophys Acta,1991,1072(2-3):129-157.
  • 7Akins PT,Liu PK,Hsu CY.Immediate.early gene expression in response to cerebral ischemia[J].Stroke,1996,27:1682-1687.
  • 8Kiessling M,Stumm G,Xie Y,et al.Differential transcription and Translation of immediate,early genes in the gerbil hippocampus after transient global ischemia[J].J Cereb Blood Metab,1993,13:914-917.
  • 9Morgan JI,Curren T.Immediate-early genes; ten years on[J].Trends Neurosci,1995,18(2):66-67.
  • 10Eiichi Hinoi,Vladimir J,Balcar NK,et al.Nuclear transcription factors in the hippocampus[J].Progress in Neurebiology,2002,68(2):145-165.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部