期刊文献+

利用《大学生人格问卷》进行大学新生心理问题筛查 被引量:11

Screening of Mental Problems in Freshmen with “University Personality Inventory”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 对大学生人格问卷的筛选标准进行探讨。方法 应用人格问卷量表测量 2 2 72名大学新生。结果 大学生人格测量得分最低为 0分 ,最高为 46分 ,平均得分为 9 88± 6 73分。 8 9%的新生总分超过 2 0分 ,其中 3 3 %的新生超过 2 5分。有各类心理问题的人数为 :一类占总数的 2 7 3 % ,二类占 2 5 6% ,三类人数近 5 0 % ,三者 (P <0 0 1 )差异显著 ;1 5 0人患有心理症倾向 ,占总数的 6 65 % ,其中抑郁症、精神分裂症和神经症分别占总数的 7 6%、 4 9%和 2 8% ;有 1 67%的人有自杀意念 ;超过 1 / 5的新生有咨询要求。结论 以人格问卷的总分来判断 ,人格问卷筛选标准有较好的地区分度 ,能够客观区别有无心理问题。 Objective To investigate the psychology of freshmen in China.Methods University Personality Inventory (UPI) was used to investigate the psychology of 2273 freshmen of South China Agricultural University, recruited in 2002, 1404 males aged 19.04±0.93, and 866 females aged 19.04±0.93. Results The general score of UPI was 9.88±6.73. 8.9% of the freshmen got a UPI score >20.85. freshmen (3.3%) got a UPI score >25.27.3% of them were catogorized as UPI class Ⅰ, 25.6% as UPI class Ⅱ, and nearly 50% as UPI class Ⅲ. The general UPI scores of the freshmen of these 3 groups were significantly different between any 2 group of them (all P<0.05). Those who had an intention of suicide, totally 38 (1.67%) got a UPI score of 21.84±9.34, significantly higher than those without an intention of suicide (9.68±6.49, P<0.01). Those who selected ≥2 critical questions or auxiliary questions got an average UPI score of 17.49±8.34, significantly higher than those who selected one critical questions or auxiliary question (9.15±6.07, P<0.01). More than 1/5 of the freshmen had the needs for psychological counseling. 25% of the freshmen, considered themselves with psychological problems. However, only 3.7% of them had sought psychological counseling.Conclusion According to general UPI scores, the screening standard of UPI can objectively distinguish mental problems.
出处 《中国健康教育》 2004年第7期584-586,共3页 Chinese Journal of Health Education
关键词 大学新生 大学生人格问卷 分析 Freshmen UPI Analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献23

  • 1纪宏.高师院校大学生心理素质调查研究及自杀危机干预[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),1999(1):26-33. 被引量:77
  • 2李慕云,林美清.云南民院学生与北京高校学生UPI测查比较研究[J].云南民族大学学报(自然科学版),1994,7(1):57-62. 被引量:8
  • 3张明圆.精神科评定量表手册[M].长沙:湖南科技出版社,1998..
  • 4徐世朴 樊富民.大学生心理健康的量测试验及其结果的分析与研究.全国大学生心理咨询专业委员会第二届学术交流会议论文集[M].北京:-,1992.33-37.
  • 5龚耀光 编著.修订艾森克个性问卷手册[M].长沙:湖南地图出版社,1992..
  • 6Phillips MR, Li X, Zhang Y. Suicide rates in China, 1995-99.Lancet, 2002, 359:835-840.
  • 7Ji J, Kleinman A, Becker AE. Suicide in contemporary China: a review of China' s distinctive suicide demographics in their sociocultural context. Harv Rev Psychiatry, 2001,9:1-12.
  • 8Murray CJL, Lopez AD. Glolml Health Statistics, Cambridge:Harvard University, 1996.
  • 9Phillips MR, Liu H, Zhang Y. Suicide and social change in China. Cult Med Psychiatry, 1999, 23:25-50.
  • 10Durkheim, E. Suicide. New York:Free Press, 1951. 145-276.

共引文献104

同被引文献77

引证文献11

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部