期刊文献+

董事激励与公司业绩——实验的证据 被引量:10

Directors'Incentives and Corporate Performance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我们在实验框架下检验了董事会成员的激励对股东财富和CEO报酬的影响,以及该报酬与公司业绩之间的敏感度.文中提出了两种任命董事的方法,一种由CEO任命,另一种由最大的股东自动担任董事.由董事会决定CEO的报酬,而CEO负责企业的生产、投资和分红决策.投资者根据接收到的每个公司的分红、资本收益这些信息,通过买卖这些企业的股票来调整他们的资产组合. 我们发现,薪酬与业绩之间的敏感度随董事持股比例的增加而上升.此外,当大股东作为董事会成员时,经济体所产生的财富(股东财富是其中的一部分)更大;而当CEO选择董事时,结果是缺乏效率的.本文讨论了关于董事职能和相关代理成本这一研究结果,以及标准会计框架下,限制执行人员报酬和报表标准化要求. We examine the effect of the incentives of the members of the board of directors on shareholder wealth, CEO compensation and the sensitivity of this compensation to corporate performance in laboratory setting. Two methods of appointing the board, one by the CEO and the other by the largest shareholder, constitute the main treatment. The board sets the compensation for the CEO, who makes production, investment and dividend decisions for the firm. The investors receive information about dividends, earnings and capital of each firm, and use this information to manage their portfolios by buying and selling shares in these firms.We find that the sensitivity of the pay-performance link increases with the fraction of equity owned by the directors. Further, the wealth generated in the economy as a whole, as well as the shareholders' part of this wealth, is greater when a large shareholder serves the role of the board of directors; when CEOs choose the director, outcomes are less efficient. Implications of these findings on the role of directors and associated agency costs; on accounting standard setting, especially with regard to accounting for options; on limits to executive compensation; and on standardization of reporting requirements are discussed.
出处 《南开管理评论》 CSSCI 2004年第4期4-14,共11页 Nankai Business Review
关键词 CEO 首席执行官 公司业绩 独立董事制度 激励机制 薪酬体系 委托-代理关系 股东利益最大化 Directors' Incentives Corporate Performance Experimental Evidence
  • 相关文献

参考文献50

  • 1Landsman; Wayne and Alan C. Shapiro. Tobin's Q and the Relationship Between Accounting ROI and Economic Return,Accounting Working Paper No. 89-3, Anderson Graduate School of Management, University of California at Los Angeles. 1989.
  • 2Baker, G. P.. Piece Rate Contracts and Performance Measurement Error, Mimeo, Harvard Business School. 1989.
  • 3Fama, Eugene. Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm.Journal of Political Economy. 1988, (2): 288-307.
  • 4Gibbons, Robert and Kevin J. Murphy. Relative Performance Evaluation for Chief Executive Officers. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1990, 43(3) 30s-51 s.
  • 5Gibbons, Robert and Kevin J. Murphy. Optimum Incentive Contracts in the Presence of Career Concerns: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Political Economy, 1992, 258-276.
  • 6Grossman, Sanford and Oliver Hart. An Analysis of the Principal Agent Problem. Econometrica, 1983, 7(1): 7-45.
  • 7Hart, Oliver. The Market Mechanism as an Incentive Scheme. Bell Journal of Economics, 1983, 14(3): 366-82.
  • 8Harris, Milton and Arthur Raviv. Optimal Incentive Contracts with Imperfect Information. Journal of Economic Theory, 1979, (20):231-59.
  • 9Haubrich, J.. Risk-aversion, Performance Pay and the Principalagent Problem. Journal of Political Economy, 1994,468-505.
  • 10Hemmer, T.; S. Matsunaga and T. Shevlin. Fair Value of Employee Stock Options with Expected Early Exercise. Accounting Horizons,December, 1994, 23-42.

同被引文献105

引证文献10

二级引证文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部