诗学误读·互文性·文学史被引量：1

导出

摘要本文从后结构主义的互文性理论角度切入“耶鲁学派”的哈罗德·布鲁姆的文本观 ,分析互文性理论在其文学史理论中的关键作用 ,指出“诗学误读”理论突破了新批评的形式主义一元论 ,同时使他摆脱了解构主义的意义空缺和文学史空缺等虚无主义倾向。最后 ,本文指出布鲁姆的心理分析模式存在的不足。

作者胡宝平

机构地区中山大学外国语学院

出处《国外文学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第3期13-18,共6页 Foreign Literatures

关键词互文性理论后结构主义哈罗德·布鲁姆 “耶鲁学派” 文学批评

参考文献15

1Terry Eagleton, Literary Theory: An Introduction ( Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press, 1983), p. 186.
2Julia Kristeva , Semiotike : Recherches pour une semanalyse ( Paris :Seuil, 1969), p. 255.
3Julia Kristeva, La Revolution du language poetique ( Paris: Seuil,1974) ,pp.388 - 9.
4[18]Harold Bloom, Poetry and Repression: Revisionism from Blake to Stevens ( New Haven: Yale University Press, 1976), p. 3,p.2,p.2.
5[12][17][19][20][21]Harold Bloom, The Anxiety of Influence : A Theory of Poetry ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973 ), p. 43, p. 21,p.58,p.94,p.96,p.96,p.11.
6Ann Jefferson and David Robey eds., Modern Literary Theory: A Comparative Introduction (London: Batsford Academic and Educational Ltd., 1982), pp. 1 - 15.
7就笔者所知,韦勒克曾在三个地方探讨过文学史问题,参见 Rene Wellek, Concepts of Criticism ( New Haven: Yale Univeristy Press, 1963), 137 - 53页; Rene Wellek and Austin Warren,Theory of Literature ( New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich,1977) ,252-68 页; Rene Wellek, "The Fall of Literary History", The Attack on Literature and Other Essays (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1982) ,64 - 77 页.
8Harold Bloom et al., Deconstruction and Criticism ( London: Routledge and Kega Paul, 1979) ,pp.vii - ix.
9Jonathan Culler, Pursuit of Signs: Semiotics, Literature, Deconstruction ( New York: Cornell University Press, 1981 ), p. 108.
10John Frow, Marxism and Literary History (Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1986), p. 128.