期刊文献+

以戴震治《诗》论吴皖之分

On the Division of Wu and Wan Based on Dai Zhen’s Study of Shijing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文主要就戴震治《诗》方面 ,来对以信古与求是作为标准划分学派这一问题作一爬梳。论证内容如下 :一、戴震在治《诗》时求是 ;二、戴震在治《诗》时求古。其不仅信古 ,而且泥古 ;三、揭示求古与求是之联系为 :求古为了求是 ,舍古无以为是。论证作吴皖之分不妥的原因为 :抹杀了是与古之联系 ;掩盖了学术发展的历史轨迹 ;作出了名不副实的学术分野。 Based on Dai Zhen’s study of Shijing, the article primarily checks the division of schools by the criterion of believing in the antiquity or pursuing the truth. Dai Zhen pursued both the truth and the antiquity in his study of Shijing. He not only believed in antiquity, but also was obsessed by it. The paper believes the purpose of pursuing antiquity is to pursue the truth. The author believes it is not appropriate to separate Wu and Wan into two schools since this division obliterated the relationship of the truth and antiquity, concealed the historical track of academic development and fell short of the reality.
作者 程嫩生
机构地区 浙江大学古籍所
出处 《上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2004年第4期71-75,共5页 Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词 戴震 《诗经》 吴派 皖派 治学方法 pursued the truth pursued the antiquity the division of Wu and Wan
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1[1](清)粱启超.中国近三百年学术史[M].北京:中国书店,1985.22.
  • 2李山.《诗经》研究的新材料:《孔子诗论》[J].中国古代、近代文学研究,2002,(4):182-183.
  • 3伽达默尔.真理与方法[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1992.383.
  • 4[7](清)梁启超.清代学术概论[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1998.47.
  • 5[8](清)文渊阁四库全书(册85)[M].台湾:商务印书馆股份有限公司,1986.327-329.
  • 6季旭升.诗经古义新证[M].北京:学苑出版社,2001.
  • 7[11](清)戴震.戴震全书(册6-7)[M].合肥:黄山书社,1997.371-8.
  • 8[12](清)阮元.研经室集(二集,卷7)[M].上海:上海书店,1989.15.
  • 9[14]陈祖武.清代学术拾零[M].长沙:湖南人民出版社,2002.164.

共引文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部