摘要
本文主要就戴震治《诗》方面 ,来对以信古与求是作为标准划分学派这一问题作一爬梳。论证内容如下 :一、戴震在治《诗》时求是 ;二、戴震在治《诗》时求古。其不仅信古 ,而且泥古 ;三、揭示求古与求是之联系为 :求古为了求是 ,舍古无以为是。论证作吴皖之分不妥的原因为 :抹杀了是与古之联系 ;掩盖了学术发展的历史轨迹 ;作出了名不副实的学术分野。
Based on Dai Zhen’s study of Shijing, the article primarily checks the division of schools by the criterion of believing in the antiquity or pursuing the truth. Dai Zhen pursued both the truth and the antiquity in his study of Shijing. He not only believed in antiquity, but also was obsessed by it. The paper believes the purpose of pursuing antiquity is to pursue the truth. The author believes it is not appropriate to separate Wu and Wan into two schools since this division obliterated the relationship of the truth and antiquity, concealed the historical track of academic development and fell short of the reality.
出处
《上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2004年第4期71-75,共5页
Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词
戴震
《诗经》
吴派
皖派
治学方法
pursued the truth
pursued the antiquity
the division of Wu and Wan