期刊文献+

头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗急性脑血管病并发肺部感染的疗效

Comparative Study on Therapeutic Effect of Cefoperazone/Sulbactam and Ciprofloxacin in Treatment of Pulmonary Infection Complicated by the acute Cerebral Blood Vessel Disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :比较头孢哌酮 /舒巴坦与环丙沙星治疗急性脑血管病并发肺部感染的疗效。方法 :急性脑血管病并发肺部感染 90例 ,分为 2组。头孢哌酮 /舒巴坦治疗组 4 2例 ,用量 3givdbid ,7~ 14d为一疗程 ;环丙沙星对照组 4 8例 ,用量 2 0 0mgivdbid ,7~ 14d为一疗程。结果 :治疗组与对照组有效率分别为 97.6 0 %和 72 .90 % ,细菌清除率为 90 .4 8%和 6 6 .6 7% ,两者均有统计学差异 (P <0 .0 1) ;不良反应发生率 ,治疗组 2 .38% ,对照组 2 .0 8%。结论 :头孢哌酮 Objective: To compare the therapeutic effect of cefoperazone/subactam and ciprofloxacin in the treatment of pulmonary infection complicated due due to the acute cerebral blood vessel disease.Method: 90 cases of pulmonary infection complicated by the acute cerebral blood vessel disease were divided into 2 groups: cefoperazone/sulbactam group 42 cases,cefoperazone/sulbactam 3.0 , ivd, bid, 7 14 days as one course of treatment; ciprofloxacin group, 48cases, ciprofloxacin 0.2 , ivd, bid, course of treatment as former.Result: The effective rates in two groups were 97.60% and 72.90% , respectively, and the bacterium eliminative rates were 90.84% and 66.67% respectively, there was a statistical difference ( P < 0.01 ), the side effect incidences were 2.38% and 2.08% , respecfively.Conclusion: Cefoperazone/Sulbactam is effective in the treatment of pulmonary infection complicated due to the acute cerebral blood vessel disease.
出处 《中国药师》 CAS 2004年第7期542-543,共2页 China Pharmacist
关键词 头孢哌酮/舒巴坦 环丙沙星 肺部感染 Cefoperazone/sulbactam Ciprofloxacin Pulmonary infection
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献12

  • 1李家泰,缪竞智,胡文芝,顾俊明,吕媛,贾玉霞,李立津,王慧玲.舒巴坦-头孢哌酮与头孢噻肟随机对照治疗细菌性感染207例多中心临床试验[J].中华内科杂志,1995,34(10):680-682. 被引量:21
  • 2唐英春,张天托,张扣兴,毕筱刚,朱家馨,朱宁.舒普深治疗下呼吸道感染30例[J].中国新药杂志,1996,5(2):87-88. 被引量:5
  • 3于润江,马壮,李尔然,王镇山,刘广杰.舒普深对细菌性感染的疗效评价[J].中国实用内科杂志,1996,16(8):471-473. 被引量:17
  • 4[1]Jones RN,Barry AL,Thornsberry C,et al.The cefoperazone-sulbactam combination.In vitro qualities including beta-lactamase stability,antimicrobial activity,and interpretive criteria for disk diffusion tests.Am J Clin Pathol,1985,84:496-504.
  • 5[2]Acar JF,Minozzi C.Role of β-lactamases in the retistance of gram-negative bacilli to β-lactam antibiotic.Rev Infect Dis,1986,8(Suppl 5):S482-S486.
  • 6[3]Bush K,Jacoby GA,Medeiros AA.A functional classification scheme for beta-lactamases and its correlation with molecular structure.Antimicrob Agents Chemother,1995,39:1211-1233.
  • 7侯世荣,伊澎,叶明敏.头孢哌酮/舒巴坦对医院感染细菌的抗菌活性[J].中华医院感染学杂志,1997,7(1):18-20. 被引量:16
  • 8Wenzel RP. Prevention and treatment of hospital-acquired infection[A]. Wyngarden JB, Smith LH. Cecil Textbook of Medicine[M]. 18th ed, Philadephia: WB Saunders Company, 1988, 1541-1549
  • 9Fagon J, Patrick H, Haas DW, et al. Treatment of Gram-positive nosocomial pneumonia: prospective randomized comparison of quinupristin/dalfopristin versus vancomycin. Nosocomial Pneumonia Group[J].Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2000, 161(3 Pt 1):753-762
  • 10Lynch JP 3rd. Hospital-acquired pneumonia: risk factors, microbiology, and treatment[J]. Chest, 2001, 119(Suppl 2):373S-384S

共引文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部