期刊文献+

土壤溶质迁移的两区模型与两流区模型对比分析 被引量:25

Analysis of two-region model and two-flow domain model for soil solute transport
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文在分析描述土壤溶质迁移的两流区与两区模型的区别与联系的基础上,利用连续和脉冲输入情况下的试验资料对两区和两流区模型的预测能力进行了比较和分析。结果表明,与两区模型相比,两流区模型可以更好地描述优先流情况下的溶质穿透曲线。对于无优先流情况,两个模型预测结果基本相同。通过在无优先流情况下两个模型参数间关系的分析发现,在连续流输入情况下两个模型的参数一致性较好,而在脉冲输入时一致性较差。 Based on the analysis on the relationship between the two-region model and two-flow domain model for soil solute transport, the prediction functions of these two models are compared by the experimental data obtained from continuous input test and pulse input test. The result shows that the two-flow domain model is better than the two-region model in describing the breakthrough curve in case preferential flow is existed, but there is no difference between the predictions of these models if without preferential flow. The analysis on the relationship between the parameters of these models under the condition of without preferential flow shows that they are identical for continuous input but remarkably different for pulse input.
出处 《水利学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2004年第6期92-97,共6页 Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金(40371057) 黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室及中科院水土保持研究所"百人计划"资助项目
关键词 两流区模型 两区模型 土壤溶质穿透曲线 two-region model two-flow domain model solute breakthrough curve
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1Li Wang Ma, H M Selim. Transport a nonreactive solute in soils: a two-flow domain approach [J]. Soil Science.America, 1995, 159 (4): 224- 234.
  • 2Jaehoon Lee, Dan B Jaynes, Robert Horton. Evaluation of simple method for estimating solute transport parameters:Labortory studies [J]. Soil Science Socliety of America Journal. America, 2000, 64 (2): 492 - 498.
  • 3雷志栋 杨诗秀 等.土壤水动力学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1987..

共引文献4

同被引文献398

引证文献25

二级引证文献145

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部