期刊文献+

国产头孢呋辛治疗下呼吸道、泌尿道感染的随机对照、多中心临床试验 被引量:2

A randomized controlled, multicentral clinical trial of domestic versus imported cefuroxime in the treatment of lower respiratory tract and urinary tract infections
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 评价国产头孢呋辛和进口头孢呋辛治疗感染性疾病的疗效和安全性。方法 随机、对照、多中心研究 ,每组 6 0例 ,其中下呼吸道、泌尿道感染各 30例 ,两药剂量均为每次 1.5 g,q8h,静滴 ,疗程 7~14 d。结果 国产和进口头孢呋辛治疗下呼吸道感染的临床痊愈率分别为 70 %和 6 0 % ,有效率均为 93.3% ;治疗泌尿是感染痊愈率分别为 93%和 83% ,有效率均为 10 0 % ,细菌清除率国产头孢呋辛组 96 .4 % ;进口头孢呋辛组 96 .3%。国产和进口头孢呋辛组不良反应发生率分别为 1.7%和 3.3%。两组疗效和不良反应无统计学差异 (P>0 .0 5 )。结论 国产头孢呋辛治疗下呼吸道感染、泌尿道感染性疾病安全、有效 ,与进口产品等效。 Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of domestic and imported cefuroxime in treatment of lower respiratory tract and urinary tract infections. Methods The trial was conducted in 60 patients with lower respiratory tract infections and in 60 patients with urinary tract infections. They were randomly and equally divided to receive 15g domestic cefuroxime i.v., three times daily (q8h), or the same dose of imported cefuroxime for 7~14days. Results The cure rate, effective rate in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections were 70%, 933% and 60%, 933% for domestic cefuroxime and imported cefuroxime, respectively. In urinary tract infections were 93%, 100% and 83%, 100% respectively. The bacterial clearance rate and ADRs incidence rate for domestic cefuroxime and imported cefuroxime were 964%, 17% and 963%, 33% respectively. No significant difference between groups was observed (P>005). Conclusion Domestic cefuroxime is as effective and safety as imported cefuroxime.
出处 《中国抗生素杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第7期409-411,438,共4页 Chinese Journal of Antibiotics
关键词 头孢呋辛 下呼吸道感染 泌尿道感染 临床试验 Cefuroxime Lower respiratory tract infection Urinary tract infection Randomized controlled trial
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1de Klerk G J, van Steijn J H, Lobatto S, et al. A randomised, multicentre study of ceftriaxone versus standard therapy in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections [J]. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 1999,12 (2) : 121
  • 2Turna A, Kutlu C A, Ozalp T, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in elective thoracic surgery: cefuroxime versus ce fepime [J]. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2003,51 (2): 84
  • 3白松,田陆云,田风.西力欣预防老年人腹部手术后切口感染[J].广东药学,2002,12(2):40-40. 被引量:7

二级参考文献1

  • 1张中声等.老年急腹症学.天津科技翻译出版公司.第一版.1979:7-9

同被引文献12

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部