期刊文献+

水权与民法理论及物权法典的制定 被引量:147

水权与民法理论及物权法典的制定
原文传递
导出
摘要 水权由水资源所有权派生出来 ,是汲水权、引水权、蓄水权、排水权、航运水权等组成的权利束 ,具有私权与公权的混合性质。由其支配形式的特殊性与其客体的特殊性所决定 ,其客体的特定性是个别形态 ,不特定性反而常见。汲水权、引水权等类型犹如水所有权主体的转换器 ,其运行使水所有权从水资源所有权中分离出来 ,转归水权人享有。因此 ,它们不含有占有权能。水权基本上不具有排他性 ,应通过优先性规则来解决水权人之间的利益分配。依据先占用原则取得的水权闲置达一定年限便归于消灭。因水权与典型物权差别过大 ,物权法不宜直接规定 ,但应为其预留足够的发展空间。 Water right is a cluster of rights derived from the ownership of water resources. It consists of the rights to draw, divert, conserve, and discharge water and the right of navigation on water and has the mixed nature of private and public rights. Due to the special character of the form of its disposition and of its objects, its objects are more of a non-specific nature than of a specific nature. The right to draw and to divert water and other types of water rights are like converters for the subject of ownership of the water. Their operation separates the ownership of water from the ownership of water resources and transfers it to the owners of water. Therefore, these rights do not have the capacity of possession. Basically, water right is not an exclusive right and the distribution of interests among the owners of water should be resolved according to the principle of priority. Water right acquired according to the principle of priority will become extinct if left idle for more than one year. Because water right differs greatly from the typical right of things, it should not be direct provided for in the Code on the Right of Things, which, however, should leave enough space for its development. The relevant civil law theories should also reflect on this issue.
作者 崔建远
机构地区 清华大学法学院
出处 《法学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2002年第3期37-62,共26页 Chinese Journal of Law
  • 相关文献

参考文献76

  • 1Jan G. Laitos, Water Rights,Clean Water Act Section 404 Permitting, and the Takings Clause, University of Colorado Review. (1989).
  • 2林柏璋.《台湾水权及其法律性质之探讨》.水利部政策法规司编.《水权与水市场》(材料选编之二),2001年,第196页.
  • 3裴丽萍.水权制度初论[J].中国法学,2001(2):90-101. 被引量:139
  • 4John C. Peck, Kent Weatherby, Condemnation of Water and Water Rights in Kansas, University of Kansas Law Review.(Summer, 1994).
  • 5Jan G. Laitos,Water Rights, Clean Water Act Section 404 Permitting, and the Taking Clause, University of Colorado law Review. (1969).
  • 6Wells A. Hutchins, Water Rights Law in the Nineteen Western States.298-306(1971).
  • 7金泽良雄.《水法》.法律学全集第15卷.园部敏,田中二郎,金泽良雄.《交通通信法·土地法·水法》,有斐阁1968年版,第81页.
  • 8K.S.A.? 82a- 701(g) (1997).
  • 9John C. Peek, Assessing the Quality of a Water Right, Journal of the Kansas Bar Association. (May,2001).
  • 10KAN.SrAT.ANN.? 82a- 1305(1989).

二级参考文献28

  • 1米健.用益权的实质及其现实思考──法律的比较研究[J].政法论坛,1999,17(4):33-49. 被引量:23
  • 2里昂德.伯顿,克里斯.库克林,杜群.新西兰水资源管理与环境政策改革[J].环球法律评论,1998,20(4):22-31. 被引量:10
  • 3钱明星.论用益物权的客体[J].中外法学,1998,10(1):54-61. 被引量:16
  • 4关涛.试论地役权制度的存在价值[J].中外法学,1996,8(3):19-22. 被引量:11
  • 5[英]F·H·劳森 B·拉登著 施天寿译.《财产法》[M].中国大百科全书出版社,1998年版.第3-4页.
  • 6王轶.《所有权保留制度研究》.载梁慧星主编.《民商法论丛》第6卷.法律出版社,1997年版,第594页,第629~632页.
  • 7胡鞍钢,王亚华.《转型期木资源配置的公共政靠:准市场和政治民主协商》,水信息网:http://www.hwoc.com.cn.
  • 8纪东等编.《新编六法全书》之《台湾水利法》第15条,台湾五南图书出版公司,1986年版.
  • 9《法国民典》,罗结珍译,中国法制出版社,1999年版.
  • 10[澳]阿乐克斯·加德纳.《水资源法改革》,尤明青译,载《环境资源法论丛》第1期,法律出版社,2001年版.

共引文献182

同被引文献1448

引证文献147

二级引证文献891

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部